AMDG Meeting Notes 2012-02-14

Date and Time

  • Date: Tuesday, 14 / 02 / 2012
  • Time: 11h PT / 14h ET / 19h UTC

Attendees

  • Sal D'Agostino
  • Keith Hazelton
  • Heather Flanagan
  • Colin Wallis
  • Joanne Knight
  • Bob Sunday

Apologies

Agenda

AGENDA:

1. Administrative
a. Roll Call
b. New member introduction - no new members
c. Agenda confirmation
d. Action item review
2. Discussion
a. Report

Open Action Items

Action Item Review : (*Action Items numbered as *YYYYMMDD-01 Assignee : description....)

Action Item

Assigned To

Description

Status

Comments

20111108-04

Heather

Review the eGov requirements and see what information can be used/discussed at next call

In progress

need to map/check off the requirements in the repository in the text of the report

20111206-03

Colin

Report back as liaison with OASIS Trust Elevation

COMPLETE

 

20111220-01

Keith

send notes on discussion of the Mapping workshop from the Internet2 MACE-Dir call

In progress

For background, see http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/AMDG/Notes+from+attribute+break-out+session

20111220-05

Sal

have an attribute gap session at IIW in January and report back

 

 

20111220-06

Sal

report back on the "13+3" DOD attributes

In progress

Did not find this particular reference yet, but found others and added them to the repository; will close by next week (Feb 21)

20111220-07

Heather

have initial discussion group report ready by February 14 call

In progress

http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/AMDG/Report+-+DRAFT

20120103-02

Keith

Update SCIM info in repository

 

 

20120131-01

Sal

Schedule Don Thibeau (OIX-AX) for a DG-AM call in Feb

 

 

New Action Item

Action Item Review : (*Action Items numbered as *YYYYMMDD-01 Assignee : description....)

20120214-01

Joanne

Update wiki or send HF email regarding areas of report unclear to someone not embedded in this space

 

 

Discussion – Report

  • Some struggle with scope, works for people "in the know"
    • AI: Joanne to mark up wiki or send HF email regarding what areas are difficult for someone not embedded in the conversation
  • Modification of AI 20111108-04, for HF to make sure that the eGov requirements are represented in the report
  • Are we talking about contents or containers when discussing attributes? There is a lot of work at the federation identity level to answer this question, and different protocols approach it differently.
  • Feedback on Recommendations
    • Attributes - tying it to real people with LoA, which in turn ties back to Governance
    • Governance - different sectors are doing this, so we have examples in action; UMA should be part of governance, and they are working to fill the gap in user management part of governance
    • Kantara could vet the work coming out of the different groups to make sure it all applies broadly; the specific sector groups don't have a wide-enough view to really see how their would can or cannot scale; in general there is a need for someone to provide assurance around attributes, and since Kantara has an existing assurance program around identity this could be a good fit; if OIX is looking to be where an exchange of these things, they can't also be in the business of auditing and assuring these things; at some point we'll need to describe how to do LoA on attributes and there are repository references to this work, but there is no functioning accreditation effort yet
    • Context - create a discussion group to describe what contexts might be and how they might be used; characterizing them and registering/exposing them, a value needs to be put on context; you might be able to capture more of the liabilities and risk if you know the context
    • Query Language is more like an OASIS or W3C thing than a Kantara thing; too technical for this DG; it plays out here but is not in our mandate
    • part of context, perhaps - Mapping the Attribute Ecosystem: technological and sociological - environmental survey of groups and activities in attribute management space (there are dozens at least) and we know about most; can we go to each of those groups and come back with a 1 paragraph description of where they fit in the attribute management space, where they are orthogonal or overlapping; this should be a prerequisite to the attribute LoA work
  • we're trying to see if Attribute Management can actually exist, not discuss what you could do with it
summary of timeline
  • next draft based on input from today's call and action items by Feb 28
  • by first meeting in March (if not sooner), be able to declare this done enough to send to the LC and prepare for a final edit based on their feedback

Next Meeting

  • Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2012
  • Time: 11h PT / 14h ET / 19h UTC
  • Dial in: * Skype: +99051000000481 * US Dial-In: +1-805-309-2350 | Room Code: 613-2898