...
- Mark King commented that maybe NISt can NIST could follow the eIDAS labels: low, medium, substantial and high.
- Richard asked to correct the IAL3 row as it should be supervised.
- The group agreed to suggest that the new category should be labeled differently from the other levels, labeling could be a challenge to those who have already been approved as meeting the requirements of an existing level.
- The group agreed on Eric comments.
- Ken will provide a final version so Ruth can prepare the inputs in GitHub by Friday at the end of the day.
...
- Link to the RFI: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-04-19/pdf/2021-07957.pdf
- Deadline to provide a response: June 18th
- Colin commented that Tom Jones shared this link during the last HIAWG meeting https://wiki.idesg.org/wiki/index.php/Mobile_Driver%27s_License_Criteria where Tom has started to draft the responses. Tom has clarified to Colin that he has shared and discussed this work with the FIRE WG.
- LC prefers that Kantara provides a combined response rather than individual WG response. the WGs submit individual responses.
- Colin commented that he is considering the possibility to contract an expert technical writer to combine the answers.
- Ken suggested that the most relevant questions for the IAWG would be the Q3 industry standards and Q15 obstacles to acceptance.
- Roger stressed the relevance of the mDL developments so Kantara should provide as many inputs as possible taking this opportunity for greater visibility.
Next meeting: 2021-05-20