Date
Oct 13, 2016
Attendees
Voting
...
| Info |
|---|
|
Participant Roster (2016) - Quorum is 4 of 7 as of 2016-10-06 Iain Henderson, Mary Hodder, Harri Honko, Mark Lizar, Jim Pasquale, John Wunderlich, Andrew Hughes |
Goals
Discussion Items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|
| 10 mins | - Roll call
- Agenda bashing
- Minutes approval
| Former user (Deleted) | |
| 25 min | | Former user (Deleted) | - David to reply to Iain's comment on list
- This CR document will not be sufficient for what Iain is describing - other documents and work will fill that need, but this specific document is not all-encompasing
- Other comments: it would be helpful to describe the broader context within the Introduction section
- Is there a document family that CIS WG will develop over time?
- Can we create a list of 'documents that must be written' - to allow us to refer to documents that don't exist yet but will fill in the obvious missing bits
- An 'Executive Summary' section would be helpful
- In the UMA document model, they use the Use Cases to contain what is effectively the Executive Summary
- Look at OAuth/OpenID Connect document family to see if there's a good list of docs
- Maybe WS* family
- Maybe ISO 15504 (capability maturity model)
- Maybe W3C?
- The 'Purpose List' text should probably be removed from the specification - it's specific to the verticals/implementers and very hard for this group to resolve
- Display of PII/sensitive information - there are a few issues still to be resolved - such as if a CR is transmitted and has PII in it, then there are privacy concerns and security concerns
- Discussion on aspects of presentation of CR information to humans
|
| | - Funding requests to LC/Board
| Mark Lizar | - This is the time of year to submit funding requests to LC and Board
|
| 15 min | - Discussion on IIW plans and activities
| All | - Andrew, David, Colin, Mary, John W, Jim P attending IIW
- Mary and Doc presenting UST to VRM Day
- Mary and John presenting CR to VRM Day
|
| 20 min | - Discussion on future structure of the WG
| Former user (Deleted) | - Thoughts on WG structure once CR v1 is into approval process
- There are several projects and interests that contribute to the larger topic of Consent and Information Sharing
- But these projects don't require every single participant to work on every project
- Digi.me is seeking to startup a taxonomy group in Kantara for the Personal Data community
|
Action Items
CR Spec publication schedule
Current: call for comments on draft spec commences
...