...
- Attendee 1
- Attendee 2
- Attendee 3
- Attendee 4
- Attendee 5
Attendance: Colin Wallis, Chair
Fulup Ar Foll, Vice Chair
Kyle Meadors Drummond Group
Terry McBride US GSA
Bob Sunday Government of Canada
Bill Young DIA, Government of New Zealand
Shin Adachi NTT
Patricia Wiebe British Columbia, Canada *Listed as a non voting member
at the roster.
Brett McDowell Kantara
Joni Brennan Kantara Proposed agenda: 1) Roll call for Quorum determination [1] (can someone volunteer to help with Minute taking please?)
2) Approve Las Vegas (F2F) Minutes, October and November Minutes [2]
3) Review status of Action Items Summary [3]
4) Review Officer Election status
5) eGov SAML 2.0 Profile V2 prep (please review email threads re this)
6) Discuss: eGov Profiles of OID and IC project - next steps: Step 1 Gap Analysis of US ICAM OID and US ICAM IC. Community volunteers please
7) LC and BoT updates (Incl. Assurance Review Board, Interop Review Board)
8) RSA planning - do we get involved? Concordia?, a panel? Call for other potential activities beyond international eGov profiles
9) Kantara F2F Portland - planning
10) AOB..
Apologies
- Not in Attendance 1
- Not in Attendance 2
- Not in Attendance 3
Agenda
- Topic 1
- Topic 2
- Topic 3
- Topic 4
- AOB
Minutes
1. Topic 1
Summary:
- Items
- Bold Items
- Italicized Items
2. Topic 2
The following officers were agreed upon by unanimous consensus:
Summary:
- List Items
- Bold
- Italicized
3. Topic 3
Summary:
- List Items
- Bold
- Italicized
4. Topic 4
- Bullet List
- Second Level Bullet List
1) Roll call:
Joni/Colin, please confirm the attendance listed above. Somehow I miss one voting member while capturing seven of them (please note Patricia is listed as a non-voting participant in the roster.) 2) Approval minutes
Attendance of Bill Young in the middle of the call allowed us to establish the quorum.
Colin moved to approve the three pending minutes to be approved per Joni's suggestion.
Terry seconded it.
The three minutes were unanimously approved. 3) action item summary
<http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/eGov/Action+Items+Summary>
01: Leave it open
03: no progress. Fulup needs to talk with FT/Orange.
02: Joni will need to follow up that. Fulup will provide Joni with another contact. Leave it open. 4) Review Officer Election status
Fulup elected as a Vice Chair 5) eGov SAML 2.0 profile v2 preparation
Colin recognized the need to start preparation for that.
Kyle suggested at this time of the year, focus on discussion, start drafting on February, continue to develop on March April timeframe for the next certification opportunity.
Bob Sunday of Canada briefed that their first requirement production date late Spring next year Kyle responded to Colin's question why we did not include LoA last time.
At that time, the work was still in progress but not even final at SSTC, or among people like Scott Canter, Paul Madsen and Bob Mogan.
Discussion was ongoing around level of assurance vs metadata vs how to deal with certificates.
Colin updated that SSTC agreed to move it to CD just yesterday.
After the call, Bob kindly shared its URL at <http://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/SAML2IDAssuranceProfile>.
In response to Brett's question on the profile, Bob said that there would be a problem of comparison (of levels of assurance). here is nothing written on the comparison of the level of the assurance (on the SSTC CD to be released). EGov profile would play a role for proper interpretation into the profile.
He also mentioned Multilingual requirements would be important for Canada. 6) eGov Profiles of OID and IC project - next steps Colin briefed his view on IMI. He showed some concerns that its use of SAML 1.1 token might restrict features Patricia mentioned British Colombia of Canada was developing IMI for BC There were some further work to be done, especially for higher level assurance.
Terry Mcbriede said there was informal discussion to solve jointly between SAML, IMI and OID. Issue was no standard way. We do not have real solution at this moment while pilot is going on for OID.
He was not concerned much about SAML 1.1 token because the products which supports SAML 2.0 token usually handles 1.1 as well.
Fulup said still better to have 2.0 token if we have stringent and better interoperability.
Colin told us British Columbia of Canada, Netherlands, part of UK are looking at OID or IMI 7) Quick updates:
RFI for Trust framework from OID foundation: Due was yesterday on December 1, 2009.
ARB is composed of six members
In response to Colin's proposal to have a sync up with ARB, Brett suggested to think about scheduling, methodologies, etc for dialog after they have two meetings. This suggestion seemed consensus at the meeting. 10) AOB
Due to the time constrains, Colin proposed to discuss agenda item 8 and
9 in the mailing list, to which everybody agreed. Meeting adjourned eight minutes past the hour.
Colin Wallis wrote:
>> Greetings all
>>