Group discussion on a number of issues (if you are reading this, please email Former user (Deleted) or make changes to reflect your actual comments:
Discussion around the review of comments in V2 of the PDURF and the merge of two external versions (sent over email in the summer & also noted in the comments).
Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) made an inquiring about working further in ISI or moving his work somewhere else based on his email inquiry several meeting ago, which were presented by jim pasquale as the formal response as follows:
Not possible change IPR midway through the WG activity
Also not possible to have a dual-IPR regime in a single WG
A new WG can be started with the desired IPR (P&C opt-out to RAND) which would require a significant effort on staff to get approval for work under current IPR to new IPR - very heavy lift.
A new IP option would take a business case, community consideration, 45-day public comment, and an all-member ballot - several months.
Taking the existing work elsewhere requires an explicit license granted by Kantara.
Which were taken meeting notes on 10/15 version 9, and regurgitated here to those still on at the end call.
Announcements
All
New Business
All
Next meeting
All
*** Next call 2020-11-19 10:30 amEastern DAYLIGHT Time