Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 8 Next »

Kantara ISI WG Teleconference

Date and Time | Attendees | Apologies | Agenda | Minutes | Next Meeting

Date and Time

  • Date:
  • Time: 10:30 Eastern Time

Approval: 2020-11-05 Meeting Minutes ISI WG 

Attendees

Participant Roster - As of 2020-02-20, the quorum is 6 of 11

(Voting participants are: Andrew Hughes  iainh1 NA (Unlicensed), jim pasquale, John Wunderlich,  Ken Klingenstein (Unlicensed), Former user (Deleted), Mark Lizar (Unlicensed), Former user (Deleted), Former user (Deleted), Salvatore D'Agostino, Former user (Deleted) )

Voting

  1. Andrew Hughes  
  2. jim pasquale  
  3. iainh1 NA (Unlicensed)
  4. John Wunderlich
  5. Former user (Deleted)

Non-Voting 

Former user (Deleted)


Apologies

Ken Klingenstein (Unlicensed)

Salvatore D'Agostino

Agenda

  1. Call to order
  2. ISI Work Group IPR Policy
  3. Approval of Agenda
  4. Approval of Minutes 2020-09-17
    1. Action Items arising from minutes
  5. Work Group Discussion & Decision Items
    1. Discussion on PDURF - content focused continued
    2. 1. Comments that need to be incorporated for inclusion in Andrew's suggested route;
      2. Comments that belong to the more substantial discussion of the alternate route.
  1. New Business
  2. Next Meeting:  
  3. Adjournment

Minutes

Item

Who

Notes

Call to Order

jim pasquale

Check for a quorum. Quorum achieved.

Reminder about attendance policy for voting status.

ISI Work Group IPR Policy

jim pasquale

A reminder of IPR policy for the WG
Approval of Agenda

Moved: 

Seconded: 

Approved

Approval of Minutes


Moved: 

Seconded: 

Discussion: None

Changes: None

Carried

Actions arising:

Project Updates (Month-end Updates) (not required this meeting)

  • AdvCIS

Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) 

  1. Deliverables
    1. ?
  2. Status: INACTIVE
  3. Issues:
    1. ?
  4. Next Steps:
    1. ?
  • Intentcasting

iainh1 NA (Unlicensed)

  1. Deliverables
    1. Report on Intentcasting
  2. Status: INACTIVE
  3. Issues:
    1. Resourcing
  4. Next Steps:
    1. Resume in October
  • Personal Data Use Receipt Framework

Former user (Deleted)


  1. Deliverables
    1. ?
  2. Status: ACTIVE
  3. Issues:
    1. Draft report comments and review
  4. Next Steps:
    1. ?
  • Privacy-Preserving Information Sharing

John Wunderlich

  1. Deliverables
    1. Survey Report
    2. Recommendation Report
  2. Status: INACTIVE
  3. Issues:
    1. Insufficient availability to proceed at this point
  4. Next Steps:
    1. Find a new lead to move the project forward OR
    2. Resume when available

WG Discussion

  • Personal Data Use Receipt Framework

jim pasquale Provided an overview

Former user (Deleted) Continued the walkthrough of the PDURF


Group discussion on a number of issues (if you are reading this, please email Kate Dowling or make changes to reflect your actual comments:

  • Discussion needed on 'roles' but not today
  • Former user (Deleted) starts with Data Model
    • The framework is intended to be a set of options that a profile writer can use to create a profile.
    • jim pasquale asks if the meeting can be recorded. No objections, so recording starts with Former user (Deleted) introducing the data model and the role of frameworks.
      • Actual receipts are issued based on profiles.
      • The data model is intentionally broad and generic
      • Framework rules should be permissive and suggestive. The framework is too broad and generic to issue a receipt on purpose.
      • Profiles MAY be contributed to the WG, but not required.
      • Former user (Deleted) will check on where/if roles are in the data model in response to a question from Former user (Deleted)
      • Salvatore D'Agostino asks about considering how the Open Notice Receipt Schema relates to the PDURF.
      • Joe Andrieu will be invited to the next meeting to talk about the data model, hopefully after reviewing feedback and comments on the contribution.
New BusinessAll

jim pasquale summarized the marking to active for the Notice and Consent Project, having not received a response or feedback back from Mark Lizar (Unlicensed)

John Wunderlich  mentioned and brought up taking a closer look at the PDURF draft and data model to draw out questions for the group to submit back to both Andrew Hughes and Joe in the near future for consideration and clarification.  

Next meeting

All

*** Next call 2020-11-05 10:30 am Eastern DAYLIGHT Time

https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/323930725

Adjournment

Moved: iainh1 NA (Unlicensed)

Seconded: Andrew Hughes

Motion carried



Action Items

  • Type your task here, using "@" to assign to a user and "//" to select a due date
  • No labels