Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Date

2020-04-16

Status of Minutes

Draft proposals for new business

Approved at: 

Attendees

Voting?

Non-Voting?

  • Daniel Harris
  • Colin Wallis

Regrets: 

Discussion Items

Time

Item

Who

Notes

 10 mins
  • Roll call
  • Agenda bashing


Thank you for joining the call today. 
This Work Group operates under the Non-Assertion Covenant IPR option found as an appendix to IPR Policies V2.0 that Kantara operates.
The Group Participation Agreement memorializes your acknowledgment of the terms under which you participate in this Work Group. Every person who has acknowledged the GPA is listed in the Participant Roster, as a voting or non-voting participant.
However, there are circumstances, such as in-person workshops or calls where non-participant guests may be present who have not acknowledged the GPA for this Work Group.

Every person on this call is strongly encouraged to acknowledge the GPA for this Work Group prior to any form of participation.
If you have not, or do not wish to, please Note Well the following before you participate in any form.

1) in accordance with the Kantara Initiative IPR Policies V2.0, all contributions by voice are valid contributions alongside the much more preferred written contributions and while you still retain your IP, you grant Kantara copyright equivalent to the terms of the Non-Assertion Covenant without further condition or reservation.

2) it is your own IP and not another party's IP

3) such contributions are not confidential or otherwise subject to the limitation in its distribution, including pricing or other competitively sensitive information.

Again, if you are uncertain about any matters, please remain silent and do not contribute anything in writing.


4/24:

 min

Intentcasting Background and Review

iainh1 NA (Unlicensed)

What i’d like to cover in our call is ‘why has intentcasting not happened before/ taken off?’. After all, we’ve been talking about it since 2008 in Project VRM, and before in a few other contexts; and the core idea that an individual should be able to safely and securely broadcast their buying intentions and get relevant responses makes perfect sense; doesn’t it?

That’s so that we can include that in our workgroup report as historical context, and see if we can tease out the blockers/ barriers that would need to be overcome for the capability to emerge at scale.

I suggest we use this post as our start point. Maybe Doc has other definitional material in The Intention Economy?

https://cyber.harvard.edu/projectvrm/Intentcasting 

Already flagged reasons why Intentcasting reasons has not yet taken off would include:

- the name is unclear/ confusing...
- it’s not well enough defined…
- i’m not sure what products or services I buy this would be relevant to...
- there are no technical or data standards to make services easy to build…
- we’d need to be able to move our data between providers so as to not be locked in...
- Google does a good enough job with Search...
- none of my existing suppliers work this way…
- the CRM software/ service providers don’t have that functionality in their systems…

No doubt i’ve missed a few.






Next meetingAll

*** Next call 2020-05-01 10:30 am Eastern DAYLIGHT Time

https://www.gotomeet.me/KantaraGTM2/isi-wg-intentcasting






  • No labels