Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

Date and Time

  • Date: Tuesday, 21 / 08 / 2012
  • Time: 11h PT / 14h ET / 19h UTC

Attendees

  • Heather Flanagan
  • Ken Dagg
  • Keith Hazelton

Quorum: 6 of 8

Non-voting:

  • Andrew Hughes

Apologies

  • Colin Wallis

Agenda

AGENDA:

  1. Administrative
    1. Roll Call
    2. New member introduction - no new members
    3. Agenda confirmation
    4. Approval of Minutes: AMDG Meeting Notes 2012-06-05
    5. Action item review
  2. Discussion
    1. Working Group Charter review
    2. Report from mini-F2F (Keith)

Approval of Minutes

Call not at quorum; no minutes approved

Open Action Items

Action Item Review : (*Action Items numbered as *YYYYMMDD-01 Assignee : description....)

Action Item

Assigned To

Description

Status

Comments
20120619-01Sal, KeithDraft a new WG charter for Attribute Management1st draft complete, see Repository 
20120619-02SalPost links to the UK tenders in the Repository  

 

New Action Item

Action Item Review : (*Action Items numbered as *YYYYMMDD-01 Assignee : description....)

Action Item

Assigned To

Description

   


General discussion

Attribute Working Group Charter

For reference: Work Group Approval Process

Report from mini-F2F

  • From Joni: Kantara would fit in the large and active attribute space in the following areas: Which attributes are necessary for attribute assurance, how they are used, how that use and best practice are assessed
  • From Keith: Issues discussed: http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/AMDG/Selected+Attribute+Management+Issues
    • Focus of the meeting was on the WG that attended (HIAWG, P3WG, IAWG) more than the Attribute Management DG
    • Note the particular challenges for an Attribute Management WG (from Keith's slides) : 
      • Problem #1: The players don’t feel the need for coordination
        Problem #2: My perceived “duplicated work” is your “invaluable forum for solving my unique problems’”
      • Summarizing: how would we even have jurisdiction? there was mixed feedback on whether we should go forward with a WG and/or whether we'd be successful
    • One other point made was that NSTIC would force some of this work and we should just wait for it (which sure doesn't take in to account the international point of view)
  • (Andrew) what are the other groups actually doing? Should we consider really focusing on attributes that can be assured? do we tie this back to assessments and certification?
  • (Keith) the most essential work could happen in the Identity Assurance WG and the P3WG, possibly more effectively than a separate Attribute Management WG

 

AOB

Next Meeting

  • Date: Tuesday, August 28, 2012
  • Time: 11h PT / 14h ET / 19h UTC
  • Dial in: * Skype: +99051000000481 * US Dial-In: +1-805-309-2350 | Room Code: 613-2898
  • No labels