Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

DRAFT


Date

Attendees

See the Participant roster

Voting (6 of 10 required for quorum)

Participant

Attending

1

Aronson, Marc

2

Chaudhury, Atef / Krishnaraj, Venkat

3

Davis, Peter

4

Dowtin, Jazzmine

Yes

5

D'Agostino, Salvatore

6

Hodges, Gail

7

Jones, Thomas

Yes

8

Thoma, Andreas

9

Wunderlich, John

Yes

10

Williams, Christopher

Yes

Non-Voting

Participant

Attending

1

Auld, Lorrayne

2

Balfanz, Dirk

3

Brudnicki, David

4

Dutta, Tim

5

Flanagan, Heather

Yes

6

Fleenor, Judith

7

Glasscock, Amy

8

Gropper, Adrian

9

Hughes, Andrew

10

Jordaan, Loffie

Yes

11

LeVasseur, Lisa

12

Lopez, Cristina Timon

13

Snell, Oliver

14

Stowell, Therese

15

Tamanini, Greg

16

Vachino, Maria

17

Whysel, Noreen

Goals

  • Check-in on work progress

  • Review draft outline and status of writing tasks

Discussion items (AKA Agenda)

Time

Item

Who

Notes

5 min.

  • Start the meeting.

  • Call to order.

  • Approve minute

  • Approve agenda

John Wunderlich 

Called to order: 10:03 PT

Quorum reached: No

Minutes to approve:

2023-04-05 Meeting notes - Draft

2023-04-12 Meeting notes - Draft

0 min.

Open Tasks Review

All

DescriptionDue dateAssigneeTask appears on
John Wunderlich2024-05-08 Meeting notes

45 min.

Draft Report

John Wunderlich

Talk about 3 hour working sessions re: the Implementor’s Guidance

  • What is the implementor’s guidance for? High-level scope and shape of what the requirements will ultimately be. Implementors who want to produce a mobile credential for physical presentation in a privacy-enhancing manner will get insight on the kinds of things they’ll have to do.

  • Will take this to the list to coordinate

  • Doodle for working sessions:

https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/el2LqpMb

5 min.

Other Business


EIC and Identity Week slides

  • Overview and Trust Triangle

    • Note that the density of the trust triangle might be a problem; suggest just a higher level triangle to start

  • Verifiers

    • Show relevant corner of the trust triangle

  • Providers

    • Show relevant corner of the trust triangle

  • Issuers

    • Show relevant corner of the trust triangle

  • Roadmap (Guidance report, Requirements, and Profiles)

    • Maybe full triangle here?

Adjourn


Next meeting

Action items

  •  
  • No labels