APPROVED
Date
Attendees
See the Participant roster
Voting (4 of 7 required for quorum)
Participant | Attending | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chaudhury, Atef / Krishnaraj, Venkat | X |
| 2 | Davis, Peter | |
| 3 | Hughes, Andrew | |
| 4 | Jones, Thomas | X |
| 5 | Thoma, Andreas | X |
| 6 | Wunderlich, John | X |
| 7 | Williams, Christopher | X |
Non-Voting
Participant | Attending | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Auld, Lorrayne | |
| 2 | Aronson Mark | |
| 3 | Balfanz, Dirk | |
| 4 | Brudnicki, David | |
| 5 | D'Agostino, Salvatore | |
| 6 | Dowtin, Jazzmine | |
| 7 | Dutta, Tim | |
| 8 | Flanagan, Heather | |
| 9 | Fleenor, Judith | |
| 10 | Glasscock, Amy | |
| 11 | Gropper, Adrian | |
| 12 | Hodges, Gail | X |
| 13 | Jordaan, Loffie | |
| 14 | LeVasseur, Lisa | |
| 15 | Lopez, Cristina Timon | |
| 16 | Pasquale, Jim | |
| 17 | Snell, Oliver | |
| 18 | Stowell, Therese | |
| 19 | Sutor, Hannah | X |
| 20 | Tamanini, Greg | |
| 21 | Vachino, Maria | |
| 22 | Whysel, Noreen |
Goals
Check-in on work progress
Review draft outline and status of writing tasks
Discussion items (AKA Agenda)
Time | Item | Who | Notes | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 min. |
| Called to order: 13:06 Quorum reached: No Minutes to approve: 2023-09-20 Meeting notes | |||||||||
5 min. | Open Tasks Review | All |
| ||||||||
5 min | Announcements | Discussion of next steps. The Implementor’s draft is being sent to the work group for an electronic vote. The options for voting are:
Please send your vote via email to John Wunderlich with a CC to Christopher Williams & Hannah Sutor The implementor’s report will be approved if the majority of the votes cast are Approve or Approve with comments/suggestions The deadline for voting will be two weeks: Once the voting is complete, and assuming that the vote is to approve, John Wunderlich Christopher Williams Hannah Sutor will do a final edit to address suggestions and then publish the report on the Kantara Reports and Recommendations page. To be clear, we understand that this is a V1 version of the report, and anticipate that it will be updated when the workgroup gets to set of requirements for a recommendation report. John Wunderlich noted that it may be the case that elements of the Implementors report will become the introduction or framing in the Recommendation report. | |||||||||
35 min | Requirements discussion | ||||||||||
10 minutes | Other Business | ||||||||||
Adjourn | 13:40 |
Next meeting
Action items
- All workgroup members should review the draft report sent via email and vote on or before