Date
Feb 22, 2016
- Quorum
Roll Call
Read In Minutes for Approval
Action Item Review
(moving forward in agenda)
New Items -
- problems with skype,
- Mark sent msg to Oliver to troubleshoot
- Discuss Call Agenda Creation Workflow
Item 1 - Agenda Workflow
Mark posted suggested workflow to Github - as prep for agenda discussion
- suggesting process for capturing issues and discussion points and adding these to wiki and agenda by priority
- working with consensus items on calls in order to expidite Spec Dev.
- we discuss the json being a part of the main MVCR.
- John No - should go in to appendix
- Mark Yes - its not that simple.. partially yes, we can seprate it , but difinively no to moving out of spec into appendix
- Mary Yes
- like the logic of having the JSN filelds makes sens in opening technical side or use, at least as example
- good to take time and ask opinions of people with experience
- Mary - what would the questions be to others? how do we involve others?
- should the consent receipt be a policy format agnostic to any format like JSON
- Mary - what would the questions be to others? how do we involve others?
- should the consent receipt have a framework as a suggestion, recommened with caveat that any others can be made.
- What examples should we look at ?
- calendar
- mac, yahoo, msft
- calendar
- What examples should we look at ?
- micro formats
- Pop-SMTP
- Do Not Track
- Ad-Blocker
- Cookie implementations
- number of instances in the existing formats - how (in what way) to pick what micros format for the fields -
- bottom up is the date and time example
- suggests looking at five.
- bottom up is the date and time example
- Iain
- marketers want a spec - and common standard. No competitors to this yet, we need to get it out.
- - as long as it delivers a minimum viable policy for implementation - lets get it done
- ineeds an output simple marketing language
- needs to be able to be used as a marketing tool. (business requirements)
- (everyone agree's)
- Mary - Brought up Uber as interested in the consent receipt and UST
- may be able to get implementaton wth them
- Mark Suggest that spec can have the guidance for the policy of putting a receipt in any format or a single format be open, (and still be compliant with MVCR spec) while also, using a common JSON format for example and development of v.1 - (as apart of main spec) for help with implementation, needed to make MVCR useful for inter-op. (which is a key priority)
- asking can this can be done via a table in main spec as (default example)
- we ta tabled this issue for github and asking advice
- going forward- general proposal
- use call time to go through fields and write spec to consensus. (5 min max to discuss item/5 min to write item as issue)
- if we have an issue or discussion item, (5 min to record it/5 to discuss it )
- (notes)
- Try to bring issues you might have for the spec up on the list before the call so that we can have best chance of dealing with issues in consensus on the call
- all items that people need time on can be tabled for one week. (upon request)
- (notes)
- if we have an issue or discussion item, (5 min to record it/5 to discuss it )
- use call time to go through fields and write spec to consensus. (5 min max to discuss item/5 min to write item as issue)
Action Items
- Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) - Update wiki with revised method for agenda creation -
- Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) work on timeline and roadmap for v1 - and present next week
- John Wunderlichiainh1 NA (Unlicensed)Former user (Deleted)Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) Homework - look at examples of previous specs - like Tim Berners - URI, the ICAL format, Email, etc as examlples of do's and don't for spec dev. look at and discuss issues. . (from respective perspecitves)
- John Wunderlichiainh1 NA (Unlicensed)Former user (Deleted)Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) --> proposal for offline discussion - if someone needs more time on an agenda item, then that person can table this issue to the next meeting, (1 week) before being discuss on the agenda