Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

Roll Call

Approve Agenda

(Note: If someone is speaking or presenting an item they should not typically be chair, so we'll need to appoint a chair while Mark presents. The chair can act as the timekeeper as well.)

Read In Minutes for Approval

Feb, 1,8, 22, (need Reading in)]

John Motion for the minutes to be approved, Iain seconds, no objections.

We  agree on the fields. 

 

Issue:of adding one field  to the MVCR came up as a mush. "Consent Type" for the addition of implicit and explicit field.

We had a good discussion about explicit and implicit consent and if this should be a binary consent choice where explicit is defined by a checkbox with the words "I consent to X"  next to it.    (which is a contract  (tort law) implementation of the contract to consent.

But, Mark proposes that privacy law and principle all have the common same requirements or explicit consent.  And that the provision of a consent receipt itself with valid contact details is equivalent to partially compliant consent. for consent across all jurisidictions.   does implied consent requirement a receipt? if so does it require sharing and optional fields ?  perhaps an implied consent receipt should be defined as the MVCR ?

(Editors Note: Does this introduce the concept of the Consent Label - i.e.  explicit - checkbox style agreement to privacy conditions?    Does this introduce the idea of implicit being expressed (i consent response in some manner) ? I.e. - the sharing and control of the data is assumed to be the operator and it assumed that the operator is trusted.

This depends oh what exaclty constitutes the definition of explict and implied consent for the MVCR.   

Is filling in a form implied consent and is  clicking submit technicallly an explicit consent ?

Action: Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) create issue in GithUb and send topic to list

Action: Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) put field changes to the list prior to call next week if there are any.

Action Item Review 

      • Mark Lizar - Update wiki with revised method for agenda creation -
      • Mark Lizar work on timeline and roadmap for v1 - and present next week
      • John WunderlichIain HendersonMary HodderMark Lizar  Homework - look at examples of previous specs - like Tim Berners - URI, the ICAL format, Email, etc as examlples of do's and don't for spec dev.  look at and discuss issues. .  (from respective  perspecitves)
      • John WunderlichIain Henderson Mary HodderMark Lizar --> proposal for offline discussion -   if someone needs more time on an agenda item, then that person can table this issue to the next meeting, (1 week) before being discuss on the agenda

Discussion Items

TimeItemWhoNotes
4X5Min IntroMark
  • Note: adding as strawman for reference - agree that this can be moved forward offline
4X5minCR Header 
  • review table structure
Upto 5 min per fieldCR HeaderMark
  • Review Fields in table structure
 CR Header 
  • Record issues and topics -
Action Items at 9:50 Mark 

Any Other Business

Action Items

  • No labels