Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 51 Next »

Editors:

VersionStatusWriterEditorreviewer

v.01


XMark Lizar - ; Summary of IntentMary Hodder 
v.02X Mark Lizar & Mary Hodder Stakeholder Analysis  John Wunderlich
v.03 XJohn & Mark: Summary of Compliance ContentsMary Hodder 
v.04Current

Spec Outline: Mark Lizar

PDS Walkthrough: Markus Sabadello

Open Notice CR Demo: Mark Lizar


John Wunderlich  
v.05Next Edit   


Action Items

Related Documents:

 

Respect Network (RN) Technical Demo:

Open Notice  Website - Consent Receipt - Technical Demo

  • Provides a simple consent receipt to show compliant policy (in progress) http://on.smartspecies.com/receipt-example/
  • Show Directory of Supporters with consent to appear directory managed by supporters personal data store (in progress)

Overview

This is a specification to develop an open consent notice protocol for trusted services.  The specification combines legal, technical and social consent elements and records them in a transparent manner which is called a consent receipt. The consent receipt demonstrates the technical aspects, the fields required for the Minimum Viable Consent Receipt (MVCR) represent the legal aspects, and the trusted services and the compliance scale represent the social aspects of this specifications. 

 

Specification by example (SBE) is a collaborative approach to defining requirements and business-oriented functional tests for software products based on capturing and illustrating requirements using realistic examples instead of abstract statements. It is applied in the context of agile software development methods, in particular behavior-driven development. This approach is particularly successful for managing requirements and functional tests on large-scale projects of significant domain and organisational complexity.[1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavior-driven_development)

A key aspect of specification by example is creating a single source of truth about required changes from all perspectives. This latest version specification with this document title is the single source of truth. 

Objective

The aim of the specification is to increase usability and the legal compliance of consent.  This means that:

  1.  An Organisation can use the MVCR to self assert that they are providing notice and getting implied consent in compliance with their policies and applicable regulations
  2. An service user (individual) can save the  MVCR to a personal cloud and self assess if the receipt is compliant with the policies and practices of the organisation

Interoperability & Scalability 

  • Interoperable: the common format provide a common structure  for the consent provisioner (the individual) to mange consent globally
  • Open Notice is currently working on an open source: Open Consent Registry (OCR), which will be a customisable registry that can be use to automate the functions required to process and use consent receipts at scale.

Background

The Open Notice Initiative is an effort that calls for open consent (http://opennotice.org/callforcollaboration).   This has resulted in the development of this specification for a Minimum Viable Consent Receipt(MVCR).

Glossary 

  • Minimum Viable Consent Receipt(MVCR)

  • Consent Receipt (CR) 

  • Data Subject(DS)

  • Data Controller(DC) 

  • Trusted Services; A provider of Trust/Privacy Icons, Standard Assurance,  Reputation Services, Trusted Network, Trusted Protocols, 

  • Minimum: (in Minimum Viable Consent Receipt) means to only  include only the fundamental links needed to gain transparency and make further usable the consent receipt for consent and identity management. 

  • Viable: (in Minimum Viable Consent Receipt) refers to the utility of the receipt being transparent. (Note: wether the receipt is compliant legally is a secondary factor to producing a record of consent)

Minimum Viable Consent Requirements

By its format and structure the MVCR is intended to provide the basic information to review further the compliance of policy for consent. The MVCR is a format for an organisation to link, capture and sign existing (required-to-be open) policy information for consent.  The receipt is intended to provide a structure to capture  all the consent provided (cookie, terms, privacy policy) at the time of consent enabling the data controller to provide a compliance by default receipt.  (as seen in Walkthrough 1) 

A usability of a minimum viable consent receipt can then further be extended with additional notice and consent requirements specific to data subject jurisdiction, data type, location of consent and additional stakeholder contexts. (see extensions) 

MVCR enables organization to self-assert that they are compliant (or compliant by design)

Technically - this means that if a DC that collects personal data provides the fields listed in the MVCR, and does not share personal information or collect sensitive personal information, then the receipts and policies are compliant by default. (see compliance scale and audit f.or MVCR)

A MVCR with a complaint status will assure a basic level of general regulatory compliance with a much higher usability.  It will do this by being digitally represented, digitally accessible, providing at the minimum a clear way to find the Data Controller contact,  required address, and purpose(s) of consent as a standard format.  This format can then be audit for these data points at a glance, with one click access to all consent related policies by default. This can further be enhanced with organisation integrated trusted services (icons and links) to be added to the receipt.  These trusted services, for instance privacy icons or Terms of Service, are then used to further extend the usability and increase the control of consent and trust it provides. 

MVCR: Notice Elements

 Minimum: means to only  include only the fundamental links needed to gain transparency and make further usable the consent receipt for consent and identity management. 

Field NameDescriptionPurpose/ExplanationReason Why This Field is Required

Cloud Receipt Capture & Sign: Format example in (XDI)

Note: following lines all prepended with ([=]!:uuid:1111/[+]!:uuid:9999)

Data Subject

Name or pseudonym of the user at minimum,

Data Subject is primary party to consent

Is the consent contributor and primary party of the consent, (which is why this is the first field of the MVCR)

if not signed by Data Subject then its use post consent may be limited.

Data Subject: Alice [=]!:uuid:1111

Address (and jurisdiction) of Data Controller

Name of the entity issuing the receipt

Should be the entity/organization that is in control of the personal data and is responsible for consent compliance.Is the Data Controller and is the primary party responsible for administration of the consent

Data Controller: Amazon [+]!:uuid:9999

PurposeThe purposes for which the personal information is being collected.this is a single purpose at minimum linked to the short purpose notice, or policy of purpose.

A purpose notice is a basic and common legal requirement and functionally a requirement of consent.

[#receipt]!:uuid:1234[<#purpose>]<@0>&/&/"We need to process your payment."

[#receipt]!:uuid:1234[<#purpose>]<@1>&/&/"We  need your data to prevent fraud."

[#receipt]!:uuid:1234[<#purpose>]<@2>&/&/"We will advertise to you."

Location of Consent

The location of the consent provision. from which the consent receipt originates.(For example the web page with the consent button. )

This indicates the 'point of consent' - hopefully a button where the user clicked "I agree" or "I consent" (i.e. the biggest lie)

Can be a URI, URL, URN, 

This can also be a physical space where surveillance legal notice requirements exist (EU) - Global Positioning System (GPS)

 

[#receipt]!:uuid:1234<#location><$uri>&/&/"....." 

Sensitive Personal Data Flag (Y/N)Flag to categorise the information collected as sensitive or not (Y/N)Each jurisdiction has classifications of sensitive personal information: The generally include health, financial, Child Protection, Religious, Union categorisations

If Yes, then additional notice requirements are needed to confirm its compliance status.

If No, then the consent is automatically compliant

[#receipt]!:uuid:1234<#sensitive>&/&/true

Third Party Sharing

Flag whether data is shared with third parties. (Y/N)

If true, then compliance is dependent upon additional notice requirements not present in a MVCR. This can be addressed with the "Third Party Sharing" extension.

If Yes, then additional notice requirements are needed to confirm its compliance status.

If No, then the consent is automatically compliant

[#receipt]!:uuid:1234<#third><parties>&/&/true

TimestampWhen consent was obtainedTo record when the user, either by implication or explicity, granted consent for the purposes described. [#receipt]!:uuid:1234<$t>&/&/"2014-07-13T21:32:52"
Privacy PolicyThe issuing entity's privacy policy (either inline copy, or reference to URI)If not available, should provide a notice that it is missingIs the minmum Policy (or short notice) Needed to create a consent receipt.

[#receipt]!:uuid:1234<#privacy><#policy>&/&/"copy of privacy policy here"

or

 

[#receipt]!:uuid:1234<#privacy><#policy><$uri>&/&/"https://..."

     
ContextFlag wether the Operational Requirements are present or not. (Y/N/Unknown)For the presentation of consent there are contextual and prescriptive requirements in legislation, a check list of these elements is being crated in this draft below. (this list is living draft )

Consent has contextual compliance requirements for the notice to be sufficent. These depend on the location of the consent and data subject.

An organisation can agree to add address this list when implementing the consent receipt.

 

 

Notice Legal Requirements Included for the MVCR Format (in progress)

 

 

Notice RequirementDescriptionUK

UK DPA 1998

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29

EU

Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31995L0046:EN:HTML

USACanada
Contact of Data Controller (DC)Legally required to provide contact details of the DCXX  
Address of Data Controller (DC)Legally required to provide contact details of the DCXX  
Purpose(s)Legally required to provide purpose for data controlXX  
Third Party Legal RequirementsThis is a flag to see if additional notice extensions are requirements to assess complianceXX  
Sensitive Personal InformationThis is a flag to see if additional notice extensions are requirements to assess complianceXX  

 

Context: Operational Context Legal Requirements for MVCR Context (in progress)

Each jurisdiction has prescriptive text which need to accompany specific types of consent as well as legally written terminology for these requirements.   With notices there are also contextual and prescriptive requirements in legislation, a check list of these elements is being crated in this draft below. (this list is a draft 

ContextDescription UK

Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31995L0046:EN:HTML

EUUSACanada
Online Consent

To provide notice at point of consent the consequences of not provisioning consent

 XX  
Online ConsentTo indicate what is required and optional information to provide for consent XX  
Physical ConsentSign posted upon entry to physical space     

Note:  also requires specific text  to accompany a notice at the point of consent, which may vary depending upon legal jurisdiction and context.

 

Extensions for the MVCR

Open Consent Notice Extensions 

 

Extension Types

In each jurisdiction there are sensitive types of personal information found in privacy and data protection law.  Each sensitive type corresponds to a jurisdiction an industry of existing assurance and a community of trusted services.   These can be layered on to of the MVCR to meet requirements from multiple jurisdictions and industries and context.

These extensions also enable policy makers to localise the use of consent notices by jurisdiction. 

An extension can be written to strengthen the compliance of a consent receipt, 3rd party trusted services can also be used to extend the compliance or trust inherent to corporate process and these can be added in the form of linked Icons to the consent receipt.

 

MVCR Proposed Extensions (in progress)

 

 These are the extensions tables.  This is an active list of extensions being planned and/or developed  need to include the name of the filed, have a description, context, benefit, and examples.

The various table currently include. 



Field NameDescriptionInstructionsLegal Requirement (this item must be listed on LR table)

Context

(this item must be listed in the Operational Requirements table)

(usability/Interoperability Benefit) XDI Example
JurisdictionThe jurisdictions of the parties: the data protection authority is mandatory.
  • this is taken from the data controller address and the location of the consent.
  • optional the jurisdiction of for the data subject can be added with the consent of the data subject and if the receipt is stored directly in a personal data store.
  Usability: enables receipt to be used as evidence or for the purpose of legal data controls out of context of the consent event.

[#receipt]!:uuid:1234<#jurisdiction>/$ref/[=]!:uuid:1111<#jurisdiction>

[=]!:uuid:1111<#jurisdiction>&/&/"US"
[+]!:uuid:9999<#jurisdiction>&/&/"DE"
3rd Party      
Sensitive Data      
Trusted Services Extensionability to add trusted services to the minimum viable consent receipt     
       
Consent Receipt Request ExtensionThis is a button a user can press to request a consent receipt from a business
  • scrape consent session and send request to MVCR DC Contact field for a reciept (byproviding a form)
  • hypothetical: if an org responds with all of the information they automatically get an above compliant rating
This is for all contexts of the MVCRUsability 
Policy Extension for Consent Cookie Policy LinkThe issuing entity's cookie policy Link (either inline copy, or reference to URI)If not available, should provide a notice that it is missing or self assert an icon Legally in the EU a cookie requires explicit assent

 

 

[#receipt]!:uuid:1234<#cookie><#policy>&/&/"copy of cookie policy here"

or

[#receipt]!:uuid:1234<#cookie><#policy><$uri>&/&/"https://..."

Policy Extension for Terms of Service LinkThe issuing entity's terms of service (either inline copy, or reference to URI)If not available, should provide a notice that it is missing Legally Terms need to be open and accessible in order to be fair and reasonable.

 

 

[#receipt]!:uuid:1234<#tos>&/&/"copy of tos here ..."

or

[#receipt]!:uuid:1234<#tos><$uri>&/&/"https://..."


       



Policy Extension    
     

 

Extension Example: Third Party Sharing Extension V.1

 

 This incorporates 3rd party sharing and purpose listing format

 

The first extension for the minimum viable consent receipt is that of linking to the consent receipt of list of third parties personal data is shared with.  In some jurisdictions it is only required that the categories of personal data be provided.

If in the MVCR the "Third Party Sharing" flag is true, this is an extension they can use to make the receipt show this level of compliance.

Enter Table: For Extension structure of 3rd party transparency

(link to Table:  

  • Categories of personal data shared & (or)
  • Name of third party shared with
  • Purpose of sharing
  • Link to third party CR & Policies


Trusted Services

Trusted services/networks and frameworks, can be used to meet or exceed notice(and therefore consent) legal requirements. Or to address the need for assurance and trust for people so that consent and its management can be automated and more usable.

 

  • Draft Trust Services Auditing Compliance Scale

     Type of Trust Framework
    • Consent Policy Format
    Personal Policy Preference

     

    Consent Extension Location

    Trusted Service Provider Examples  

    Tracker: Analytics etc:

     CookieDo Not Trackbrowser headercookiepedia, privacy clearing warehouse, Ghostery  

    Terms of Use Policy

     

     Agree to terms  TOS;DR, Citizen Me  
    Policy Tracking ServicesPolicy ComparisonHas terms materially changed ( is consent still compliant? ) TOSBack  
     Consent TypeWhat kind of consent has been receivedTo record the type of consent or whether there is an exception to the requirement for consent.   

    Reputation

     

    Trust Framework  (all trust services provide reputation)  
     

    Privacy Icons

     

    Pictorial Short Notices  Disconnect Me  
    Capture of Personal Preference at Time of ConsentDoes the issuing entity acknowledge DNTIf not available, should provide a notice that it is missing [#receipt]!:uuid:1234<#dnt>&/&/true  
     

    Data Control Protocol

       User Managed Access  
     

    Trusted Network Service

       Respect Network  
     

    Standards

          
     

    Certificates

       TrustE  
    Levels of Assurance   KI: Identity Assurance Framework  

 

Usability: MVCR Provision Example

The MVCR has a base template that is being updated all the time.

Old Version can be found XXX 

(******Template  HERE***)

We have  a template that we are using for the technical design of the consent receipt, the GUI design is also out of scope.  What is provided by default is a Consent Receipt Template that we are using for technical design. 

Open Notice Consent Receipt Example

(Example (in progress) can be found at http://on.smartspecies.com/support-open-notice/

(******SCREEN SHOT HERE***)

Storing Receipt in Personal Data Store: Technical Walkthrough Example with Respect Network

Amazon Respect Use Case: With the Respect Network and Open Notice
(Note: Amazon Respect is a Fictitious organisation used here only as an example) 

(http://open-notice.github.io/consent-receipt/amazon-mock/signup.html)

Implementation of consent receipt which is signed & created by a DC and stored in a personal Cloud. 

To make the consent receipt usability scalable it needs to be signed and put in a personal data store. 

This specification and demo is created to demonstrate a MVCR being implemented without the need for an Open Notice Registry with the Respect Network (Trusted Network) Trust Framework  which natively has the ability to provision receipts to the highest level of compliance .  This walk through demo is intended to demonstrate how a consent receipt can be stored in a personal cloud from this spec document and demonstrate 'Fast Track' usability. 

  1. DS goes to amazonrespect.com website

  2. Website presents form and asks for consent:

    1. either to sign up initially

    2. or  for additional consent and profile management when already logged in

  3. DS agrees (clicks on “i agree” button)

  4. DC website initiates creating the receipt for the consent that was just given.

  5. DC checks for reciept data collection and notice extensions and finishes creating the receipt

  6. The receipt is signed by DC.

  7. DC website sends an XDI message to DC’s RN cloud to store the signed receipt.

  8. DC shows popup window with options (what to do with the receipt). The signed receipt is embedded in the popup window.

    1. email to DS using email address in amazon profile

    2. store in users personal cloud

    3. capture in browser

    4. download receipt as pdf

    5. opt out of a receipt.  

  9. DS clicks on “store receipt in my RN cloud”. (default option)

  10. popup window asks DS, what is your cloud name?

  11. DS types cloud name =alice

  12. popup window runs XDI discovery to find DS’ RN cloud

  13. popup window sends an XDI message to DS’ RN cloud to store the signed receipt

The usability of a MVCR can then be made scalable for use in aggregate beyond the point of consent for the data subject with a process in whch the receipt is digitally signed by both parties which identifies the jurisdiction of the Data Controller and of the Data Subject.    (the digital signing of the data subject is currently out of scope of the first draft1)


 (Former user (Deleted) pls insert screen shot here)

MVCR Mock Up for Amazon Respect Use Case





Legal: Compliance Audit & Scale

The MVCR specification contains elements specific to legalese found in legislation.  These elements are listed and rated on a scale of compliance that is based on a European Regulator's Scale of Compliance.  Below is the Audit for the Minimum Viable Consent Receipt and The Scale for Measuring Compliance

 

MVCR  Compliance Audit

 

Each field on the MVCR contains legal notice requirements, each of these components are listed in and the presence of these are counted and a flag is added to record if any of these self asserted claims have been disputed and not resolved.  

 

The MVCR has a maximum rating of compliant.   Additional Ratings are possible with extensions. 

 

Notice Compliance Checklist

Non Compliant

Partially Compliant

Compliant

Above Compliant

TrustedUser Managed

Contact of DC

 

 

X

 

  

Address of DC

 

X

 

 

  

Purpose(s)

 

X

 

 

  

Sensitive Data (If NO)

 

 

X

 

  

Share with 3rd Party (If No)

 

 

X

 

  
Any of the above self asserted is
Disputed or un verifiable (Y/N Flag) (If No)
( if Yes and unresolved = Non-Compliant)
  X   
 

 

MVCR Compliance Scale

 

 

 

 

Summary of Benefits to MVCR

  1. Transparency: The MVCR receipt is a common format for the legally required  policies which provide notice.   links to all notices and demonstrate a much higher level of minimum viable notice (for consent) legal compliance.  This standard is intended to augment the existing legal notice and consent infrastructures that is already in place and reward greater transparency of consent. .  
  2. Extensible: The MVCR Spec is intended to be easily extensible and auditable, with a jurisdicitional legal compliance audit built in for making transparent legal context and controls of a consent transaction.  Meaning that consent legal notice requirements are different by jurisdictions, industry, for various sensitive data types, for sharing to 3rd parties, tracking (cookie consents), in additional to personal and contextual consent preferences of the individual.  Extensions are notice requirements layered onto this MVCR format to meet and match legal requirements and trust frameworks to address cross jurisdictional management of consent.
  3. Trusted Services Vehicle: A receipt passed to the service user at time of consent provides a legal trust framework to build upon.  As a result it is  the MVCR  is intended as a vehicle for delivering trusted services to the individual. A stakeholder can utilise trust services, which are then linked to the receipt, which further extend the compliance and "fast track" usability of consent and identity management by using a spec compliant receipt. Eg.privacy icons, TOS reputation, certifications, trusted networks, and protocols 
  4. MVC is intended to be an all purpose consent process enhancement. 
  5. This MVCR specification is intended to be used so any organisation can implement the spec and provide a MVCR.  
  • No labels