Skip to end of metadata
-
Created by Former user (Deleted), last modified on Jan 19, 2017
Go to start of metadata
You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 2
Next »
Date
2017-01-19
Status of Minutes
DRAFT
Approved at: <<Insert link to minutes showing approval>>
Attendees
Voting
Non-Voting
Discussion Items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|
10 mins | - Roll call
- Agenda bashing
- Meeting minutes approval
| Former user (Deleted) | - "Move to approve listed meeting notes previously circulated"
- Motion:
- Second:
- Discussion:
- Result:
|
1 min | | All | Please review these blogs offline for current status on Kantara and all the DG/WG: |
5 min | Update on recent Real Consent event | Mark Lizar | |
5 min | | Former user (Deleted) | - Public review and IPR claims period has started 2017-01-06, ends 2017-02-20
|
30 min | Discussion on what's next on the roadmap | All | New discussion 2016-01-12: - Note that Virtual has collected ideas from CIS individuals on how to market CR
- Note EU Article 29 data portability - from Iain email
- from the GDPR -The GDPR is a consent based legal framework which specifies "a structured, commonly used, machine-readable and interoperable format” pg 15(68) GDPR
- Discussion about organization structures that would support the work and participation best
- Note that there is a good case to re-launch the Public Policy & Privacy & Legal WG - the pace of regulation changes is high right now
- Governance is missing from the mind map
- Make sure this is in the charter of the top WG
- The terms of reference must make roles and responsibilities clear for e.g. Project Managers
- Make the case that projects can attract a different type of participant - the builders rather than the talkers
- By creating project teams we can assemble the required expertise regardless of which WG they come from
- Data Portability -> rename the Portable Data Exchange branch
- discussion
- PPP WG would have Data Portability in its remit
- The Data Exchange for portability (protocols/specifications) would be in this sub-group
- Portable data exchange - is mostly between data controllers rather than from the individual
Discussion from 2016-01-05: - Digi.me has made adjustments to their approach - consent based versus permission led access model (to be discussed on a future call)
- The group discussed the draft mindmap of potential future org structures for this WG and also reviewed the current work list for 2017
- The WG leadership team will review and refine before sharing with the broader list
- (From December 1,2016meeting)
- The list of subject areas that will be worked on:
- Consent Receipt
- There will be CR spec errata that will need to be fixed
- A v1.1 will be required within 6 months after feedback from implementers
- User Submitted Terms
- Use case library and elaboration of use cases
- UX design
- Model contract language to support each feature of the UST elements
- Requirements for API / Interfaces for CR and UST artifacts
- Requirements (text) for implementers of Consent receipt generators (code)
- Requirements (text) for Consent receipt 'viewer' (code)
- Information Sharing Agreements
- Architecture and model (text and diagrams)
- Requirements (text)
- Business requirements
- Functional requirements
- Non-functional requirements
- Specifications (text)
- Build a Kantara prototype implementation of a consent receipt management system
|
5 min | Discussion about changing the CIS WGstructure after CR v1.0 | Former user (Deleted) | |