Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Current »

Date 

Attendees

Goals

  • Per distributed agenda

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
5 MinCall to order and roll callFormer user (Deleted)
  • Quorate
  • Recording!
5 MinApproval of draft minutes of  3/18 and 4/1  meetings.Former user (Deleted)Done
10 mins

Noteworthy news and member activities--



All--


Discuss – Pop health and new Admin focus on underserved.

Health equity officer.  

Jim St.Clair – WG on how verifiable can improve health equity. Mrtin says follow-up is key.  Tom S agrees that follow-up depends on patient or individual doctor. Now the resp is shifting to more admin or orther staff. IN tech world, we are focused on meds managment. 

Former user (Deleted)this requires good identity.

Tom Jonescomplains about getting info. 

---

VA EHR – Cerner overbudget, etc.  Requirements not fit.  Former user (Deleted)






10 mins

Discussion of PatientID  coalition (remove prohibition on HSS funding of research for national health ID)   –  proposed position paper now in voting for adoption by Coalition members. 


Former user (Deleted)  – discuss his org's (GPII)  position on the PatientID Now Coalition's posiiton.  Made progress by getting "improving" graduated to "eliminating" matching errors.

Former user (Deleted) Consensus is there are no NIST-approved stds for "patient matching"

Former user (Deleted)can get to perfect matching if you have a process for correction ("healing") Resistance is that group want to be "solution agnostic"

Martin Smith (Unlicensed)patient matching vs records matching 

@carmen: we have a term, stuck with it. 

Martin Smith (Unlicensed)Do we need a healthcare ID or good strong IDs?

Carmen – think this is the most sensitive requirement . Others agree. 

Jim Kragh– All costs will be required to be disclosed by hospitals for procedures. WSJ resurrected the issue and he thinks it has legs. 






5 mins

Martin Smith (Unlicensed) updates on IAWG comments on NIST 800-63-4 issues, and place-holding response to UK request for comments. 



10 minsNew Business: 


5 minsAction follow-ups, next meeting date, and adjourn


Next meetings: April 29, 2021




Actions: 

  1.  
  • No labels