INCOMPLETE
This document records the User-Managed Access (UMA) Work Group's disposition of comments received during the Public Comment and IPR Review period for the UMA V2.0 Draft Recommendations.
Key:
- Comment Reference: The GitHub repository issue number of the comment and possibly a reference to a subpart of that issue. All issues relevant to the Public Comment and IPR Review period use both the label "V2.0" and the label "public comment period". The content of all comments has been stored in GitHub.
- Specification Reference(s): A reference such as "Grant Sec n.n" or "FedAuthz Sec n.n". "Grant" refers to User-Managed Access (UMA) 2.0 Grant for OAuth 2.0 Authorization revision 05 and "FedAuthz" refers to Federated Authorization for User-Managed Access (UMA) 2.0 revision 05, the Draft Recommendations under review. Note that issues relevant to each specification have been labeled "grant" and "fedauthz", respectively.
- Editorial or Technical: Whether the comment involves an editorial change (generally a minor clarifying change to wording) or a technical one (generally a substantive change that may require extensive implementation work). Note that a label of "editorial" has been applied to issues that appear, at first blush, to be editorial.
- Disposition: The Work Group's conclusion about the action to take in response to the comment.
- Additional Notes: Context that may be helpful for the Leadership Council.
| Comment Reference | Specification Reference(s) | Editorial or Technical | Disposition | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #326 | Grant Sec 1.3 | Editorial | Edit in commit | Editorial improvement to a spec definition raised by a WG participant; discussed by several WG participants and consensus rapidly gained. |
| #327 | Grant Sec 3.3.6 | Editorial | Edit in commit | Simple editorial wording fix raised by a WG participant; discussed by several WG participants and consensus rapidly gained. |
| #328 | Grant Sec 3.3.4 | Editorial | Edit in commit | Interpretation issue raised by a WG participant; discussed thoroughly by the WG and an editorial enhancement removing ambiguity adopted by the WG. |
#329 | Grant 7.4.1 | Editorial | Edit in commit | Incorrect cross-reference raised by a WG participant; fix applied without WG intervention required. |
| #330 | FedAuthz Sec 9.2 | Editorial | No change | Simple editorial correction raised by a WG participant; fix overcome by events (#334). |
| #331 | FedAuthz Sec 9.3 | Editorial | Edit in commit | Simple editorial correction raised by a WG participant; fix applied without WG intervention required. |
| #332 | Grant (various) | Editorial | No change | Interpretation issue raised by a (non-implementer) WG participant. A secondary commenter suggested adding clarifying wording; since a poll about the meaning among implementers on the WG produced a consistent interpretation, the WG decided not to change the existing wording. |
| #333 | Grant Sec 3.3.6 | Editorial | Edit in commit | Simple editorial correction raised by a WG participant; fix applied without WG intervention required. |
| #334 | FedAuthz Sec 1, FedAuthz Sec 9.2 | Editorial | Edit in commit | Interpretation issue raised by a WG participant; discussed thoroughly by the WG and an editorial resolution adopted by the WG involving removal of text. |
#335a | Grant (various), FedAuthz (various) | Editorial | No change | NOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub. Editorial improvement raised by an external commenter; editor recommended no change. |
| #335b | Grant (various), FedAuthz (various) | Editorial | Edit in commit | NOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub. Editorial improvements raised by an external commenter; small edits applied without WG intervention required. |
| #335c | Grant Sec 1.3 | Editorial | Edit in commit tbs | NOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub. Editorial improvement raised by an external commenter; tbs |
| #335d | Grant Sec 1.3 | Editorial | Edit in commit tbs | NOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub. Editorial improvement raised by an external commenter; tbs |
| #336 | FedAuthz Sec 5.1 | Editorial | Edit in commit | Editorial improvement suggested by a WG participant; discussed by several WG participants and consensus rapidly gained. |
| #337a | Grant Sec 3.3 | Editorial | NOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub. tbs | |
| #337b | Grant (various) | Editorial | NOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub. tbs | |
| #337c,d | Grant Sec 2, Grant Sec 3.3.2 | Technical | No change | NOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub. Technical questions raised by an external commenter; editor recommended no change. |
| #337e | Grant Sec 3.3.3 | Editorial | Edit in commit | NOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub. Simple editorial correction raised by an external commenter; fix applied without WG intervention required. |
| #337f | Grant Sec 3.3.4 | Editorial | NOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub. | |
| #337g | Grant (various) | Technical | NOTE: This comment requires reporting back to the commenter. Please see GitHub. | |
| #338 | FedAuthz Sec 3.2.1 | Editorial | Edit in commit tbs | (Post-Public Comment period) Simple editorial correction raised by a WG participant; fix applied without WG intervention required. tbs |
| #339 | FedAuthz Sec 4.1 | Technical | (Post-Public Comment period) |