2025-07-09 Meeting notes

2025-07-09 Meeting notes

Date

Jul 9, 2025

Attendees

See the Participant roster

Voting (3 of 6 required for quorum)

Participant

Attending

Participant

Attending

1

Chaudhury, Atef

 

2

Jones, Thomas

Yes

3

Krishnaraj, Venkat

 

4

Thoma, Andreas

 

5

Wunderlich, John

Yes

6

Williams, Christopher

Yes

Non-Voting

Participant

Attending

Participant

Attending

1

Auld, Lorrayne

 

2

Aronson Mark

 

3

Balfanz, Dirk

 

4

Birch, Aaron

 

5

Brudnicki, David

 

6

Buttle, Carol

 

7

D'Agostino, Salvatore

 

8

Davis, Peter

 

9

Dillon, Sam

 

10

Dowtin, Jazzmine

 

11

Dutta, Tim

 

12

Flanagan, Heather

 

13

Fleenor, Judith

 

14

Glasscock, Amy

 

15

Graaf, Irene

 

16

Grape, Richard

 

17

Gropper, Adrian

 

18

Hodges, Gail

 

19

Hughes, Andrew

 

20

Jordaan, Loffie

Yes

21

LeVasseur, Lisa

 

22

Lopez, Cristina Timon

 

23

Nedd, Shermaine

 

24

Pasquale, Jim

 

25

Snell, Oliver

 

26

Stowell, Therese

 

27

Sutor, Hannah

 

28

Tamanini, Greg

 

29

Vachino, Maria

 

30

Whysel, Noreen

 

31

Williams, Ryan

Yes

Goals

  • Review conformance documentation

Discussion items (AKA Agenda)

Item

Who

Notes

Item

Who

Notes

  • Start the meeting.

  • Call to order

  • Approve minutes

  • Approve agenda

@John Wunderlich

Called to order: 14:07

Quorum reached: Yes

Minutes to approve: Approved

Conformance documents

@John Wunderlich

Discussion:

Updated Introduction

Reviewed the Introduction. It now makes clear that scope of an assessment is determined by the role of the entity seeking to determine if their processes and systems conform. Also deter

Principle 1

Reviewed the new structure of the requirements conformance test through discussions of the first two requirements. Determined that there needs to be an addition to the Introduction so that it is clear that the conformance elements (pre-conditions, etc) constitute a minimum set. This allows entities to expand on the conformance tests to create a more robust or focused set, as long as the minimum set is still met.

Some of the original language of the requirements remains confusing, so explanatory notes about the requirements may need to be added for some requirements.


Google Doc and Sheet:

Discussion:

 

Implementors and Implementers Guidelines

All

Looking for organisations to volunteer to implement the requirements and self-certify. This is a valuable first step towards ensuring that the requirements are practicable and may lead to useful revisions.

 

Adjourn

 

Next meeting

Jul 9, 2025

Action items