2020-02-13 Meeting notes (ISI)

Jim P

2020-02-13 Notes by 2020-02-13 Meeting notes (ISI)

• Quorum achieved

• Officers selected by acclamation

• Agenda bashing

  • Reminder about completing the poll for the Roadmap
  • jim pasquale comments that there are two ways to build products. One is to respond to customer requirements/demands. The other and the one that applies to this WG is vision-based. Task now for the leadership is to go to the "Control" destination. Candidate components of that journey are included in the initial list below.
  • John Wunderlich asks what level of formality the group wants for project initiation
  • jim pasquale and Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) suggests using child pages for ideating and creating draft project proposals. Leaving it open for where the actual work gets done, depending on the leader and team.

Tasks arising from agenda

• John Wunderlichjim pasqualeFormer user (Deleted)to create a template or suggestion for creating project proposals in Confluence
  
• All to complete Roadmap poll

Ken Klingenstein presents Consent-Informed Attribute Release (CAR)  demo

Links to references in the demo forthcoming...

Welcome to the new Group Everyone. jim pasquale reminds us that the focus of the WG is personal information, while identity and information sharing are very much intertwining, other Kantara WG is focused on identity, and when appropriate or require consulting or working in those groups should be the proper procedure.

2020-02-06 Agenda 

With such a small group no business was conducted and rather, after many technical difficulties Jim did a digi.me demo with lots of interest and very good feedback and observations. Including some feedback pertaining to some of the goals of this group, specifically around categories and the need to defining them.

Ken suggested looking at and evaluating as many personal data sharing solutions identifying overlap and other use cases to driving future work.  And the group see Demos as a good path for doing so.  Therefore Ken has agreed to show some pre-release work he's working on the next call.

• The poll for the Roadmap is now open 

2020-01-30

• Ken is asking for an open discussion on 
  • As for the purpose of use taxonomy, my initial question is whether the GDPR wants a single purpose for an entire set of attributes per release or on a per attribute basis. (e.g. this attribute will be used for contact; this one for personalization, etc.) And whether other privacy regulations have the same purpose of use approaches. John Wunderlichplease write a quick brief and include the DPA work web site link https://edpb.europa.eu/. &. https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/smernice/guidelines-22019-processing-personal-data-under-article-61b_en

• Task: Please review the following link in preparation for an upcoming Poll around direction and requirements in order to obtain modeling and standards for notice/consent/permission/ for information sharing https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1FoOxiNnxSkLBaYG1t9NLfvR0INR9j18g-kP0EAtUqto/edit?usp=sharing
• A member asked for the link to a recent webinar " Why Trust and Privacy will be the biggest Opportunity and Challange for Marketers in 2020" Host and given by the Content Advisory Board Personal observation: The implication is to use JIT Consent for website interactions https://register.gotowebinar.com/recording/viewRecording/7149536280811869963/5440990869194203916/jim@digi.me?registrantKey=3158607039824071181&type=ATTENDEEEMAILRECORDINGLINK 

2020-01-24

• A request to begin the official nomination for Chair and Co-Chairs is underway and submitted to Staff after Colin made a verbal conformation on yesterday's CIS call
• Yesterday was the last official CIS call and Today is the last special ISI call, Next week we will begin meeting at the former CIS Thursday's and Time
• Discussion around moving the CMS time slot to accommodate ISI project efforts
• See below edit Reminder iainh1 NA (Unlicensed) & John Wunderlich will provide a JLINC demo 06 Feb 2020  March is open for the demo. If you would like to provide the WG with a demo please do so with ample time for members to schedule their time efficiently.
• We are also going to move the consent journey dashboard to the personal data record project, as per Iain's request. 
• If anyone would like to see other product demos outside the WG, please bring them up during new business for discussion. jim pasquale personally thinks it is a way to expand the Group's knowledge around Information Sharing, and might also attract new participants to joining the Kantara Initiative. 

Pervious call meeting items

• A Consensus was reached for the project team person in charge is now "Leader"  PTL (Project Team Leaders position now open)
• Updates on proposed or possible projects discussed:
  • Information Sharing Sustainability (John)
    
    • Accountability (John)
    • Intent Casting (Iain)
    • Information Sharing Agreements (John)
    • Health Care Use Cases (Nancy)
    • Common best practices (Jim)
  • Personal Data Record (Andrew Hughes)
    • Information Sharing Dashboard (open)
      
    • Accountability (John)
    • Health Care Use Cases (Nancy)
    • Data in Motion and Data at Rest
    • Common best practices (Jim)
  •  Consent Receipt v2 (open)
    
    • Current v1.1
    • Next Release vNext (Mark Lizar)
    • Accountability (John)
    • Purpose of Use Taxonomies (Ken)
    • v.Next framework (GitHub & Mark Lizar)
    • Health Care Use Cases (Nancy)
    • Common best practices (Jim)
  • Purpose of Use Taxonomies (Ken where does it fit? is it all three projects)
  • Consent Evolution Roadmap/Project was requested as a project by Lisa Levasseur, an outline is ready and will be posted as soon as it is submitted
    • Prior to this request, Jim suggested taking the CMS effort and resources around common/best practices and making them part of each project, where the results would be part of the Roadmap. No clear decision was accomplished and the group agreed we need to see Lisa's framework submission before deciding
    • A conversation ensued as to whether the other projects contribute to this effort by the PTLS or does work by the PTL done here flow back to the other projects 
• Colin mentioned two ways to move forward with Officers, Where:
  • should there only be one person's name submitted a simple quorate meeting can cast either approve or not,
  • otherwise, if there's more than one person nominated Staff will set up and issue an eBallot for voting. 
  • Nominations for officers after being asked by others Jim threw in his hat to continue as Chair. After contacting so has John Wunderlich & Former user (Deleted)

The survey indicates not all contributors have agreed to move 1.1 to v.next. It can't be done officially until the time period expires.

jim pasquale recommends that we break out the various sections of work in progress in the minutes by project and/or by issue so that it can be dealt with on a more granular or specific basis, rather than one large section about edits.

iainh1 NA (Unlicensed) and John Wunderlich need to move the JLINC demo to the March meeting. jim pasquale  said he'll do an update digi.me demo for the first February 6th Meeting instead.

01/24 Election of officers

• According to Colin, we should see an email opening nominations by close of business COB today. Everyone is invited to run for Chair, Co-Chairs (2), and a desperately needed Secretary position(s)  
• Anyone wishing to be nominated or nominate a person for either the WG LC or PTL (Project Team Leaders)should be ready to do so at the first official ISI WG Meeting on 1/30

1/17

John Wunderlich suggests that WG meetings are for reporting back and coordinating between projects. But this begs the question about how the projects will self-organize to be both effective and transparent. i.e. do projects want project managers, leaders, managers, rapporteurs, contributors, editors, etc.

jim pasquale WG also needs to ensure that the WG is aware of status and can help address issues or roadblocks as they arise. Maybe separate project pages in Confluence as a start. Or a separate Team Leader manager call once a quarter

Nancy Lush (Unlicensed) points out that if the projects are doing most of the work, then the frequency of Work Group Meetings may be reduced.

jim pasquale  Is in complete agreement with Nancy and believes it may only require a Full WG call once a month. as part of the "Demo" 1st monthly call