Date
Oct 21, 2015
Attendees
Former user (Deleted)al D'Agostino - IRM
Ken Dagg
- Mark Lizar
- Mary
- John
- Pete Palmer
- Joni
- Jane
Discussion Items
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roll Call | Sal D'Agostino | ||
| Kantara IPR | Sal D'Agostino | IRM would be okay tomove on IPR policy if necessary. Does moving to Rand still meet the needs for collaboration? The needs for collaboration may also consider this for UMA & UMA Dev. This continues to be sorted. The move would not be the most wide open solution but it would not be the worst. There was a discussion that in onboarding new projects WG would opt out. The question is can two IPR regimes exist in a working group depending on what the work is. A group may need outside help to sort this out. The plan will be to draft an understanding of issues and desirables and then have a legal review. If a working group wanted to take CCSA to RAND is this possible with a simple notice? Is it functionally possible to have two kinds of IPR under one working group? This would make qualifying what work is under what IPR. Would having a subworking group with CCSA under a RAND WG just need to have a header on emails identifying the IPR scheme. Does nesting work for this? One problem is that contributions to the group under CCSA governs how the contributions are governed. If the work product is to go out under the CCSA license then the working group would need to work backwards from Share Alike - how do you roll back to contributions when the work product is going out in the world under a license and address the requirements of the second regime? This is a life cycle question. Action Item: Jane to develop a few use cases from Working Group to help the gang of 5 frame the conversation. | |
| Minutes | Sal D'Agostino | There was not a quorum at the beginning of the meeting to vote. This changed before the end of the meeting. It was noted that the link in the agenda was broken. This will be fixed. | |
| Quarterly Reports | A grid document has been created under the leadership council child pages for WG leaders to link quarterly reports. | ||
| Tools | A tools document will be uploaded onto the wiki. | ||
| Voting | No votes on the Agenda | ||
Operationalizing the Kantara Theme and Collaboration
2. Trust Services and Connective Life by IPR on Spreadsheet | Eve was not able to be on the call for the UMA Discussion and IPR was discussed at the head of the meeting.
Jane will add a link on the agenda to the document on the wiki. | ||
| Working Group Updates | John - Coordinating working with in Common to work on the SAML profile to feed into SAML to end what the American in common want is more than what other federations want. Work is continuing fairly rapidly. In Common meetings are weekly the time line to finish is most likely 6 months. What in Common is putting together for software is more than they may want.
IRM is continuing to rewrite the principles agreed to and will take whatever it is and look at the world for examples. Where IRM actually exists the principles will be checked against those examples to define use cases and ways to measure characteristics of a relationship manager. Pete - In slow motion finishing up online the trust frameworks that overlap in healthcare. There has been light attendance. Mark Kredara is presenting on next weeks call on the work of the NHISAC which is similar to what HAWG is doing. They will give a briefing on the common deliverables and discuss ensuring coordination.
|