Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Kantara ISI WG Teleconference

Date and Time | Attendees | Apologies | Agenda | Minutes | Next Meeting

Date and Time

  • Date:
  • Time: 10:30 Eastern Time

Approval: 

Attendees

Participant Roster - As of 2020-02-20, the quorum is 6 of 11

(Voting participants are: Andrew Hughes  iainh1 NA (Unlicensed), jim pasquale, John Wunderlich,  Ken Klingenstein (Unlicensed), Former user (Deleted), Mark Lizar (Unlicensed), Former user (Deleted), Former user (Deleted), Salvatore D'Agostino, Former user (Deleted) )

Voting

  1. Andrew Hughes  
  2. jim pasquale  
  3. iainh1 NA (Unlicensed)
  4. John Wunderlich
  5. Former user (Deleted)
  6. Ken Klingenstein (Unlicensed)
  7. Former user (Deleted)

Non-Voting 

  1. Colin Wallis (Unlicensed)
  2. Former user (Deleted)


Apologies


Agenda

  1. Call to order
  2. ISI Work Group IPR Policy
  3. Approval of Agenda

  4. Approval of Minutes if a quorum

  5. Work Group Discussion & Decision Items
    1. Discussion on PDURF - content focused continued
    2. continue review draft comments
  1. Announcements: 

    Overview of the Foster Bill with Jeremy Grant, Better Identity Coalition speaking to the Kantara folks who are interested.
    Wednesday, Nov 11, 2020 1:00 PM - 2:00 PM (EST)

  2. New Business

  3. Next Meeting:  
  4. Adjournment

Minutes

Item

Who

Notes

Call to Order

jim pasquale

Check for a quorum. Quorum achieved.

Reminder about attendance policy for voting status.

ISI Work Group IPR Policy

jim pasquale

A reminder of IPR policy for the WG
Approval of Agenda

Moved: John Wunderlich

Seconded: jim pasquale

Approved

Approval of Minutes


Moved: iainh1 NA (Unlicensed)

Seconded: John Wunderlich

Discussion: None

Changes: 10/29 to be amended to reflect Mary's comments

Carried

Actions arising: 10/29 meeting notes to be amended

Project Updates (Month-end Updates) (not required this meeting)

  • AdvCIS

Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) 

  1. Deliverables
    1. ?
  2. Status: INACTIVE
  3. Issues:
    1. ?
  4. Next Steps:
    1. ?
  • Intentcasting

iainh1 NA (Unlicensed)

  1. Deliverables
    1. Report on Intentcasting
  2. Status: INACTIVE
  3. Issues:
    1. Resourcing
  4. Next Steps:
    1. Resume in October
  • Personal Data Use Receipt Framework

Former user (Deleted)


  1. Deliverables
    1. ?
  2. Status: ACTIVE
  3. Issues:
    1. Draft report comments and review
  4. Next Steps:
    1. ?
  • Privacy-Preserving Information Sharing

John Wunderlich

  1. Deliverables
    1. Survey Report
    2. Recommendation Report
  2. Status: INACTIVE
  3. Issues:
    1. Insufficient availability to proceed at this point
  4. Next Steps:
    1. Find a new lead to move the project forward OR
    2. Resume when available

WG Discussion

  • Personal Data Use Receipt Framework

jim pasquale Provided an overview

Former user (Deleted) Continued the walk-through of the PDURF


Group discussion on a number of issues (if you are reading this, please email Former user (Deleted) or make changes to reflect your actual comments:

  • Discussion around review of comments in V2 of the PDURF and the merge of two external versions (sent over email in the summer & also noted in the comments).
  • Former user (Deleted) discussion on next steps around reviewing the revised Data Model.
  • Former user (Deleted) discussion on one-page proposed text for PDURF
  • Discussion around best manner to address comments - proposed to focus on the substantive discussion items with Former user (Deleted) and Former user (Deleted) leading the discussion of their respective comments.
  • Former user (Deleted) discussion on refreshing consent and 2FA authentication communication - UC4. This eliminates potential dark patterns whereby conflagration between these two items might be possible.
  • Former user (Deleted) discussion on the Data Operation Party - addition of Receipt Authority, to the existing Receipt Issuer, Receipt Recipient. Is the Receipt Authority a separate category (legal entity / framework / policy endpoint), and therefore not a Data Operator? 
  • Input / Output recipients of data are NOT Data Operators
  • However, the Receipt Authority is also a Data Operator
  • Reference material - the MyData operator components are similar:

    http://mydata2016.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/mydata-operator.png

Announcements All



New BusinessAll



Next meeting

All

*** Next call 2020-11-12 10:30 am Eastern DAYLIGHT Time

https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/323930725

Adjournment

Moved: Former user (Deleted)

Seconded: jim pasquale

Motion carried



Action Items

  • Type your task here, using "@" to assign to a user and "//" to select a due date
  • Former user (Deleted) will perform a merge between the DRAFT PDUR Framework versions (John+Mary's comments merged with John+Lisa's comments)
  • No labels