Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. Roll Call for Quorum Determination
  2. Approval of prior meeting minutes
    1. Review: Leadership Council Teleconference - 2009-08-19
    2. Review: Leadership Council Teleconference - 2009-08-26
    • Deferred due to non-quorate call
  1. Discuss: UDVPI-WG Supplemental Budget Request
    1. Review: Supplemental Budget Request 2009 - UDVPI-WG
    • eGov WG expressed interest in seeing this proposal move forward.
    • This is a UD-VPI WG Proposal with expressed interest from UMA and Consumer Identity.
    • Question about timeline of deliverable. Will it go in to 2010? Understanding is to get the work in to grad student's hands prior to Jan of 2010. Vast majority of the work should be done in 2009. There may be follow on request for funding in 2010. - Clarify with Iain
    • Further questions should go to LC list
  1. Board of Trustees Update (if any) [Colin, Conor]
    • Critical discussion around financial guidance. BoT communicated that budget should be approached as if this is a grant situation where you don't know the funding that's available but the best proposal is put forth for consideration.
    • Board agreed there needs to be contingencies on items that come up through out the year aligning with Conor's comments.
    • Additional discussions occurred around budget being put toward strategy and membership drives. Any strategic ideas should be sent to BoT list, BoT reps and/or Brett M
    • BoT requests prepared strategic ideas to be shared ASAP so that they can have effective further discussions.
  1. Discuss: Process for inter-group work (especially across IPR regimes) [Bob]
    • Bob some possible Use Cases that have been discussed as cross WG / DG relevant. Bob expressed that broad Use Cases seem more natural than narrowly focused Use Cases working in separated groups.
    • Concern about developing duplicate or contridicting work streams
    • One suggestion is that the Leadership council is the place where coordination of work occurs. This suggestion is helpful but we need a way to operationalize this cross work group scenario
    • 3 Pieces
      • Initial participation
      • Cross Discussion discussion aka General Understanding across Groups of activities (in LC)
      • Cross WG work
    • Brett suggests that we need a specific Use Case to work to.
      • UDVPI is working on Use Cases that can be applied to other aspects for example Health info permission as compared to financial information in buying a car.
    • How does voted upon work get contributed to another work group?
      • ACTION: Trent to take first draft at "interfacing" steps
      • Comment that this process would be applicable to sharing with an outside standings body
  1. Discuss: IPR management process at meetings in DIDW [Dervla]

...