1. Comments that need to be incorporated for inclusion in Andrew's suggested route; 2. Comments that belong to the more substantial discussion of the alternate route.
The framework is intended to be a set of options that a profile writer can use to create a profile.
jim pasquale asks if meeting can be recorded. No objections, so recording starts with Former user (Deleted) introducing the data model and the role of frameworks.
Actual receipts are issued based on profiles.
The data model is intentionally broad and generic
Framework rules should be permissive and suggestive. The framework is too broad and generic to issue a receipt on purpose.
Profiles MAY be contributed to the WG, but not required.
Not possible change IPR midway through WG activity
Also not possible to have a dual-IPR regime in a single WG
A new WG can be started with the desired IPR (P&C opt out to RAND) which would require a significant effort on staff to get approval for work under current IPR to new IPR - very heavy lift.
A new IP option would take a business case, community consideration, 45 day public comment and an all member ballot - several month.
Taking the existing work elsewhere requires an explict license granted by Kantara.
Next meeting
All
*** Next call 2020-10-22 29 10:30 amEastern DAYLIGHT Time