...

• Date: Wednesday, 12 September 2012
• Time: 13:00 PT | 16:00 ET | 20:00 UTC (time chart)
• Call-in toll-free number: 1-866-203-0920
• Call-in number: 1-206-445-0056
  
  • Conference Code: 5423695925#
• International Dial-In Numbers

Agenda

1. Roll Call
2. Approve LC telecon DRAFT Minutes - 222012-08-201222
3. Administration:
   
   1. Executive Director report
   2. Action Item Review
   3. Quarterly Reports
   4. Kantara F2F planning
4. Discussion
   1. CHARTER WG - Attributes in In Motion Work Group- CHARTER
   2. Kantara Initiative Budget 2013 (See section 7 of the  By-Laws)
   3. Trust Framework Subcommittee
   4. NSTIC
5. WG Updates
6. BoT Liaison Representative Update
7. AOB
8. Adjourn

...

Minutes & Notes

Administration

Approve LC telecon DRAFT Minutes - 222012-08-201222

• Patrick: motion to approve the minutes; Colin S seconds; no further discussion, Minutes Approved

...

• poll says the most popular time is after the NSTIC F2F; targeting DC for Oct 31-Nov 1
• Need to lock down:
  • a host (probably not more than 50 people, anywhere in the DC metro area)
  • potential sponsors for lunches (though registration is not dependent on that component)
  • registration page
  • listing of nearby hotels

Discussion:

...

WG - Attributes

...

In Motion

...

- CHARTER

• The AMDG has published their report, had a number of next steps discussion, there is work to do beyond what would be in the scope of a DG, so it is likely time to form a WG
• Two paths identified: an ongoing landscape review; more active component around Framework Definition and Best Practice around an attribute broker model and the certification - not how to exchange or build trust, but how to verify attributes and what is appropriate for those exchanges; basically attributes as a component of compliance; so this group would be reaching out to a broad range of stakeholders to liaise with them (OASIS for the Trust Elevation, OIX for the Exchange, etc)
• One comment received: better positioned as a Creative Commons IPR policy not a PC and RAND IPR
• Discussion
  
  • (ColinW) is this too non specific or should it tie more tightly with some of the other groups working in this space? email response back is that the positioning is right because it is not overlapping and is adjacent enough; note that the verbal explanation is more clear than what is written; there should be an allowance for word-smithing of the charter but otherwise supportive of this moving forward (will have his name on it as a proposer)
  • Call for other proposers? none on this call (no discussion)
    
    

...