DRAFT Agenda
DRAFT Agenda
Admin/Reminders
Review the DEIA Survey Questions and Results, provide feedback via email or directly on the Wiki Page
Criteria for Assessing Efficacy + Terminology and Taxonomy: Jordan will begin populating these pages. Please review and submit comments via email or the Wiki directly.
Please make any final comments via email to Jordan/Peter or via Comments on the Wiki Page.
Please indicate your willingness to provide a signature on the Charter (email).
Submission to the Leadership Council will happen in the next few weeks.
Complete GPA sign-up and set up Confluence account for add/edit access
Continue to add Resources
Sign up to mailing list (if you haven’t completed a GPA)
Open Call - Presentations for DEIA related programming
DEIA Survey - Question Review - Continued Discussion - Please review the draft 2024 DEIA survey questions prior to the call and forward any edits directly to Peter Davis (equalspeterd@gmail.com)Presentation/Discussion with Stephanie Shuckers
Review Session onCriteria for Assessing DEIA Efficacy
AOB
Adjourn
👥 Participants
Voting: Peter Davis, Jordan Burris
Non-voting:
Staff: Amanda Gay, Karyn Bright
Invited Observers/Guests:
🥅Goals
Goal | Status | Date Established | Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Info | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The goals status metadata table is used for summary reports - copy the status macros from the table in these instructions: Status:
|
Discussion Items
Item | Presenter | Notes |
|---|---|---|
Criteria for Assessing Efficacy | Jordan Burris | Initial notes presented on Wiki, will continue to populate until an initial draft is developed and feedback is provided Peter: FAR/FRR are measured elsewhere, what is Kantara’s unique value-add? Jordan: These are measured elsewhere, but not applied consistently. Would also like to go one level deeper in terms of accessibility with various demographics. |
Charter DRAFT (Google Doc) | Edits being provided on Google Doc Adjust Charter draft to make sure it clear that the output for a WG would be a set of (technical) recommendations | |