Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

DRAFT

Date

Attendees

See the Participant roster

Voting (4 of 8 required for quorum)

Participant

Attending

1

Aronson, Marc

Yes

2

Davis, Peter

3

D'Agostino, Salvatore

Regrets

4

Hodges, Gail

Yes

5

Jones, Thomas

Yes

6

Krishnaraj, Venkat

7

Thoma, Andreas

8

Wunderlich, John

Yes

Non-Voting

Participant

Attending

1

Auld, Lorrayne

2

Balfanz, Dirk

3

Chaudhury, Atef

4

Brudnicki, David

5

Dutta, Tim

6

Flanagan, Heather

Yes

7

Fleenor, Judith

8

Glasscock, Amy

9

Gropper, Adrian

10

Hughes, Andrew

11

Jordaan, Loffie

Yes

12

LeVasseur, Lisa

13

Lopez, Cristina Timon

14

Snell, Oliver

15

Stowell, Therese

16

Tamanini, Greg

17

Vachino, Maria

18

Whysel, Noreen

19

Williams, Christopher

Other attendees

Goals

  • Check-in on work progress

  • Review draft outline and status of writing tasks

Discussion items (AKA Agenda)

Time

Item

Who

Notes

  • Start the meeting.

  • Call to order.

  • Approve minute

  • Approve agenda

John Wunderlich 

Called to order: 13:05

Quorum: Yes

Minutes approved with no objections

5 min.

Open Tasks Review

All

DescriptionDue dateAssigneeTask appears on
17 Jul 2024John Wunderlich2024-07-17 Meeting notes - Cancelled
17 Jul 2024John Wunderlich2024-07-10 Meeting notes - Draft
Christopher Williams2024-07-17 Meeting notes - Cancelled
Christopher Williams2024-07-10 Meeting notes - Draft

  • (From 2022-11-02 notes) If we develop the requirements doc as proposed in the notes below, we’ll address the privacy principles.

  • Note task from 2022-11-02 call for Salvatore D'Agostino (to add some words to the Purposes and Scope section of the PEMC Early Implementor’s Guidance Report) has been completed

30 min.

Draft Report Discussion

John Wunderlich 

Report from Implementor’s Report sub-group

Notes:

  • Draft is very much needing additional review to validate direction; Verifier section is farther along than the others, and the others will model off the Verifiers section if it is approved.

5 min.

Conference highlights

Requirements Review

John Wunderlich

Pending


Other Business


  • Gail suggests looking at the latest from India and the Aadhar implementation that seems to now be working well in that region. In particular, consider how that framework:

    • includes successful top-down government guidance

    • includes layering of protocols (enforced at the protocol level to achieve scalability)

  • The Aadhar implementation may not be portable to other jurisdictions, but it’s worth considering what worked there and if/how it might be applied elsewhere.

  • This will be considered as Heather Flanagan (Unlicensed) works on the Government-Issued Credentials and the Privacy Landscape paper.

  • Note Finland government uses SSI credentials for their citizens. This demonstrates that the government doesn’t have to issue the credential for it to be used by the government, and governance models can vary.

  • Open Wallet Foundation had a presentation on creating a wallet for migrant farm workers.

Adjourn



Next meeting

 

Action items

Biometric Proofing on device
  •  
  • John Wunderlich to review Gail Hodges’s feedback regarding the charter and bring back proposed changes after IIW.
  • Tom Jones to send out a link to the session from the Open Wallet Foundation on wallets for farm workers.

  • No labels