2022-11-09 Meeting notes

approved

Approved on 2022-12-07 Meeting notes


Date

Nov 9, 2022

Attendees

See the Participant roster

Voting (4 of 8 required for quorum)

Participant

Attending

Participant

Attending

1

Aronson, Marc

Yes

2

Davis, Peter

 

3

D'Agostino, Salvatore

Regrets

4

Hodges, Gail

Yes

5

Jones, Thomas

Yes

6

Krishnaraj, Venkat

 

7

Thoma, Andreas

 

8

Wunderlich, John

Yes

Non-Voting

Participant

Attending

Participant

Attending

1

Auld, Lorrayne

 

2

Balfanz, Dirk

 

3

Chaudhury, Atef

 

4

Brudnicki, David

 

5

Dutta, Tim

 

6

Flanagan, Heather

Yes

7

Fleenor, Judith

 

8

Glasscock, Amy

 

9

Gropper, Adrian

 

10

Hughes, Andrew

 

11

Jordaan, Loffie

Yes

12

LeVasseur, Lisa

 

13

Lopez, Cristina Timon

 

14

Snell, Oliver

 

15

Stowell, Therese

 

16

Tamanini, Greg

 

17

Vachino, Maria

 

18

Whysel, Noreen

 

19

Williams, Christopher

 

Other attendees

  •  

Goals

  • Check-in on work progress

  • Review draft outline and status of writing tasks

Discussion items (AKA Agenda)

Time

Item

Who

Notes

Time

Item

Who

Notes

  • Start the meeting.

  • Call to order.

  • Approve minute

  • Approve agenda

@John Wunderlich 

Called to order: 13:05

Quorum: Yes

Minutes approved with no objections

5 min.

Open Tasks Review

All

  • (From 2022-11-02 notes) If we develop the requirements doc as proposed in the notes below, we’ll address the privacy principles.

  • Note task from 2022-11-02 call for @Salvatore D'Agostino (to add some words to the Purposes and Scope section of the PEMC Early Implementor’s Guidance Report) has been completed

30 min.

Draft Report Discussion

@John Wunderlich 

Report from Implementor’s Report sub-group


Notes:

  • Draft is very much needing additional review to validate direction; Verifier section is farther along than the others, and the others will model off the Verifiers section if it is approved.

  •  

5 min.

Conference highlights

 

 

Requirements Review

@John Wunderlich

Pending



Other Business



  • Gail suggests looking at the latest from India and the Aadhar implementation that seems to now be working well in that region. In particular, consider how that framework:

    • includes successful top-down government guidance

    • includes layering of protocols (enforced at the protocol level to achieve scalability)

  • The Aadhar implementation may not be portable to other jurisdictions, but it’s worth considering what worked there and if/how it might be applied elsewhere.

  • This will be considered as @Heather Flanagan (Unlicensed) works on the Government-Issued Credentials and the Privacy Landscape paper.

  • Note Finland government uses SSI credentials for their citizens. This demonstrates that the government doesn’t have to issue the credential for it to be used by the government, and governance models can vary.

  • Open Wallet Foundation had a presentation on creating a wallet for migrant farm workers.

 

Adjourn





Next meeting

Nov 9, 2022 

Action items

@John Wunderlich create the biometric use case on the Kantara website and inform @Tom Jones so he can add to it
@Tom Jones can now add to the new use case created
https://kantara.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/PEMCP/pages/111247424
@John Wunderlich to review Gail Hodges’s feedback regarding the charter and bring back proposed changes after IIW.
@Tom Jones to send out a link to the session from the Open Wallet Foundation on wallets for farm workers.

Â