Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Kantara Initiative Identity Assurance WG Teleconference

Working Draft

This page is a Working Draft subject to further revision and has not yet been approved by the Kantara Initiative Identity Assurance WG.

Date and Time

  • Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009
  • Time: 08:00 PST | 11:00 EST | 16:00 UTC | 17:00 CET

Attendees

  • Colin Soutar
  • Shin Adachi
  • Richard Trevorah
  • Frank Villavicenco
  • Praticia Wiebe
  • Patrick Curry
  • Tom Smedinghoff
  • Nigel Tedeschi
  • John Bradley
  • David Wasley
  • Brett McDowell - Staff
  • Britta Glade - Staff
  • Joni Brennan - Staff

Apologies

  • Rich Furr

Agenda

  1. Roll Call
  2. Approve past meeting notes
  1. SAC updates pending (ARB & ICAM feedback) - Richard Trevorah to lead the update and review process
  2. FORG status and discussion (Rich Furr)
  3. AoB

Minutes

1. Roll Call

Summary:

Completed under attendance above

2. Approve past meeting notes

Summary:

Quorum was not achieved on this call. Vote was tabled.

3. SAC updates pending (ARB & ICAM feedback) - Richard Trevorah to lead the update and review process

Summary:

There were typographic comments that are shown in the redline and wiki version that has been circulated. If we don't hear back any comments on the typographic changes we can assume they can be included.

EFA 55 - Enterprise and Service Maturity
Issue: is it relevant to have provisions for this at AL1?
This aspect may appear due to OpenID discussions with ICAM
There was general agreement with the change.

Various Perspectives that we should take note of:

  • service provider
  • user
  • jurisdiction
  • owner

Discussions around legal - IF the law requires you to preserve some records then you have to do things in a secure manner. You have to destroy anything that's not required.

Hearing consensus regarding adding new text for termination criteria. - consensus achieved

CSP should only provide attributes explicitly requested. Ensure CSP is taking responsibility for attributes shared by means of their service to relying parties - consensus achieved

Decision that we need to give more time to author this section. Decision to have this call next Wednesday as an ad-hoc to work on text.

4. FORG status and discussion (Rich Furr)

Summary:

5. AoB

Next Meeting

  • Date: Day, Month Day#, Year#
  • Time: X PDT | X EDT | X UTC (Time Chart)
  • Dial in: Skype: +9900827044630912 or US Dial-In: +1-201-793-9022 | Room Code: 4630912
  • No labels