Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

Voting Participants  

Name 

Present 

Thomas Sullivan, Co-Chair

Y

James Kragh, Co-Chair

Y

Catherine Schulten, Vice-Chair

N

Noreen Whysel, Secretary/Editor

Y 

Bev Corwin

Y

Sal D'Agostino

Y

Jim StClair

N

 

Non-Voting Participants  

Name 

Present 

Simone Alcorn 

N

Michael McGrath  

N

Thomas Jones 

Y

Quorum: Yes

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

Meeting discussion outline

There is a lot of ‘technical activity’ in the marketplace and lets’ take a mid-year assessment of where RIUP is and what our next steps should be considering NIST 800-63-4 draft, is being revised and based on NISTs 4 1⁄2 hour digital identity, virtual call, last week.  It is my understanding 800-63-4A will have some major modifications along with 4C which will impact our target audience, so we are on hold for now.  But there is much going on and we need to collectively assess market activity both nationally and at the local community level; I have two in mind, one which I have visited.

As we have discussed, it is all about the USER, their smartphone and who and what can they trust today? 

Open platform:  Smart devices; Validation; Federation – a trusted source? ChatGPT, GPT4 or MIT’s C2PA-cryptography?  Please share your thoughts or ask questions of those online. 

We also need to discuss a subset of the Underserved Population, the minors (12-18; the majority have smartphones) and their need for an authenticated identity especially within the healthcare and education sectors. 

Have a restful evening,

Jim

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

1:00pmET

Mobile Drivers License

Salvatore D'Agostino

Sal shared NCCOE community of interest signup

  • https://www.nccoe.nist.gov/get-involved/join-community-interest

  • Need to join to participate and get notified re NIST MDL initiative (using existing State infrastructure, not new technology)

  • The goal of this project is to define and facilitate a reference architecture(s) for digital identities that protects privacy, is implemented in a secure way, enables equity, widely adoptable, and easy to use.

  • discussion:

    • TomJ: WA gives MDL even if homeless

    • TomS: Companies want data on MDLs

    • JimK: FL was collecting and selling MDL PII data

1:16pmET

Open Wallet Architecture Presentation to OWF

Tom Jones

Suggesting accessibility be more inclusive

MDL issuer is state: Digital Identity Solutions must be accessible to all in the State who are eligible to get one.

Mobile “Drivers License” versus Mobile Digital Identity (or Identifier)

✅ Action items

  • Everyone should add comments to Tom’s slide deck if you have additional thoughts

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels