UMA telecon 2014-01-30

Owned by Eve Maler
Last updated: Jan 30, 2014
2 min read

UMA telecon 2014-01-30

Date and Time

Agenda

  • Roll call
  • Approval of minutes
  • Action item and upcoming event/activity review
  • Notice: No meeting next week
  • Demo video status review
  • Webinar planning
    • Tentative time: Mar 20, 8-9am PT (time chart) – okay that this is in the "summertime skew" period?
  • Twitter "UMA FTW" team planning
  • IDESG healthcare RLS use case slides: next steps?
  • New Core draft 09c (now uploaded) for consideration as stable "implementor's target" draft
    • Any other issues worth discussing: on GitHub?
  • Other interop planning news
    • Upcoming call: right after this WG call
    • Okay to reorganize feature tests according to 09c?
  • AOB

Minutes

Roll call

Quorum was not reached.

Approval of minutes

Deferred.

IDESG healthcare use case

Debbie Bucci has joined the WG, and suggested in email that we consider how to engage with IHE.org. Adrian suggested that John Moehrke is a good contact to reach out to, to set up a conversation.

Adrian feels that the slides slides summarizing our analysis of UMA wrt the relationship locator server use case are accurate and helpful. It's too early to design specific swimlane flows (the "what"); what's more important at this juncture is the "who" and "why", and to understand this, we need to engage with public HIEs, the S&I Framework initiative, and others with a stake.

Feb 24 is the HIMSS conference (along with RSA and MWC). Adrian is staffing a kiosk there and has an opportunity to show our PHealthCloud video if we can finish it by then. He recommends getting Josh's input on storyboarding. Eve mentioned Kantara's interest in supporting UMA, and the HIAWG at Kantara as another group worth reaching out to. We discussed the "HIE of One" idea again briefly, in the context of choosing to aggregate vs. distribute data.

AI: Eve: Ask Joni about outreach opportunities related to HIMSS.

Core 09c

We discussed the latest changes, and concluded that we should produce a third claim profile with the client as a SAML token conveyor, and separate out the claim profiles from the core. We also reached consensus to submit the result (09d) as a rev 09 IETF I-D, and consider it a stable "implementor's target" for interop purposes.

AI: Thomas/Eve: Revise and submit the spec.

AI: Domenico: Write the SAML Client/SP profile and produce a separate "UMA Claim Profiles" spec.

Twitter team

Eve will schedule a short meeting to go over the "mission parameters" and review how to use the tool.

Attendees

As of 19 December 2013 (pre-meeting), quorum is 7 of 12. 

  1. Domenico
  2. Sal
  3. Thomas
  4. Maciej
  5. Eve
  6. Lukasz

Non-voting participants:

  • Adrian

Regrets:

  • George
  • Mark

Next Meetings

  • No meeting Thu Feb 6 (Eve regrets)
  • Focus meeting Thu Feb 13 8:30-10am PT (time chart)
  • Focus meeting Thu Feb 20 8:30-10am PT (time chart)
  • All-hands meeting Thu Feb 27 8:30-10am PT (time chart)

Â