Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Current »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

Voting Participants  

Name 

Present 

Noreen Whysel  

Bev Corwin 

N

Salvatore D'Agostino

Thomas Sullivan 

Catherine Schulten 

@Jim StClair 

Jim Kragh  

 

Non-Voting Participants  

Name 

Present 

Tom Jones  

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

  • Vote on officers 

  • Select IPR Add-On

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes

1:08pm EDT

Officer Election

Jim Kragh

Proposed Officers: 

  • Co-Chair: @Jim Kragh and @Thomas e Sullivan, MD (Unlicensed) 

  • Vice-Chair: Catherine Schulten 

  • Secretary: TBD 

  • Editor: @Noreen Whysel, Officers 

Results:  

Yea 

  • Noreen 

  • Dr Tom 

  • Bev 

  • Jim Kragh 

Nay 

  • None 

 

Barry Hieb was present. He has not signed IPA but agrees. 

Tom Jones was present, but is not a voting member. 


IPR Add-On Selection

Noreen Whysel

Andrew recommended the IPR policy add on called “Non-Assert Covenant” which not the RAND “Reasonable and Non discriminatory” one that allows participants to retain full copyright to their contributed work. “non-Assert Covenant” transfers IP of workgroup output to Kantara. 

Results: 

  • Yea 

  • Noreen 

  • Dr Tom 

  • Bev 

  • Jim Kragh 

Nay 

  • None 

New Business

Jim Kragh

Jim Kragh proposed a brief project to address smart phone, identity for underserved populations. 

Demo: Platform Basic interface to introduce population to information about mobile ID. 

 

From Tom’s Sept 22 email: 

Given the speed that some mobile IDs are moving towards adoption my personal favorite would be a very early report on the meaning(s) of an inclusive ID. Like publication w/i next two months.  

One definition might be: 

inclusive mobile ID - one where any resident of any status has the opportunity to purchase a smart phone at walmart for $30 (in 2021). A data plan must not be a requirement. That phone can be taken to a public location for connectivity and download a wallet (if necessary) and an ID with no more than a half day's effort. Note that in some cases the ID might require other documentation or specific locations where the data is loaded (such as a motor vehicle office). The availability of these offices must be reasonably accessible (tbd). The next day the ID must be usable at the intended use sites for that ID. One example would be to get onto an airplane. 

Note that this definition excludes people that cannot get to a Walmart with $30.  So adding a definition of a "dependent mobile ID" would also be needed. 

He added: 

Gates Foundation commits $200M to digital ID and other public infrastructure 

https://www.biometricupdate.com/202209/gates-foundation-commits-200m-to-digital-id-and-other-public-infrastructure  

Open Wallet Foundation is part of Linux Foundation 

Tom proposes considering a policy that requires inclusion 

Tom Will discuss at Id2020 and then will present tomorrow at Linux. 

 

Vote to work on this: 

  • Yea 

  • Noreen 

  • Dr Tom 

  • Bev 

  • Jim Kragh 

Nay 

  • None 

✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels