2025-03-27 IAWG Meeting Notes DRAFT

Meeting Status Metadata

The meeting status metadata table is used for summary reports - copy the status macros from the table in these instructions:

Quorum: status:quorate status:not quorate

Notes-Status: status:drafting status:Ready for review status:approved

Approved-Link: Insert a link to the Meeting Notes page holding the approval decision for this notes page

DRAFT 01.23.2025

Nonvoting:

Staff:

Buttle, Carol	Kantara	Present
Chopard, Kay	Kantara	Present

Guests:

Meeting is quorate when 50% + 1 of voting participants attend

There are 7 voters as of 2025-03-27

Motion to approve meeting minutes listed below:

Moved by:

Seconded by:

<< Defer to next meeting>>

Link to draft minutes and outcome	Discussion

Link to draft minutes and outcome	Discussion

Time	Item	Presenter	Notes

Item	Presenter	Notes
US Assurance Program updates	Kay/Carol	Applications are spinning up after a slow start to the year, including non-US companies wanting to do US business
General issues	All	YS: Some CSPs consider that the NIST 800-63 requirements are not really structurally built to meet the needs of “current” service provider implementations. Today, CSPs sub-contract many functions - and this is hard to capture and ends up in increased complexity. Industry input would be useful - to see if there’s an improvement to be had to better align to actual implementations? An example: GSA has internal forms to determine which services are offered by which applicants to the GSA SIN IAWG must be clear about approach and scope - is it time to break away from strict 800-63 organization? or is it time to do a more broadly applicable set of requirements? This could be an opportunity to engage a broader range of stakeholders - this could be a significant shift so we want to be sure that we are making sound decisions. To be continued…

Action items may be created inline on any page. This block shows all open action items from all meeting notes.