UMA telecon 2021-06-03
UMA telecon 2021-06-03
Date and Time
Alternate-week Thursdays 10:00am PT
Screenshare and dial-in: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/485071053
United States: +1 (224) 501-3316, Access Code: 485-071-053
See UMA calendar for additional details: http://kantara.atlassian.net/wiki/display/uma/Calendar
Agenda
Approve minutes of UMA telecon 2021-04-22, UMA telecon 2021-04-29, UMA telecon 2021-05-06, UMA telecon 2021-05-13, UMA telecon 2021-05-20, UMA telecon 2021-05-27
Continue Charter Review/Refresh
Changes to Group Leadership
AOB
Minutes
Roll call
Quorum was reached.
Approve minutes
Approve minutes of UMA telecon 2021-04-22, UMA telecon 2021-04-29, UMA telecon 2021-05-06, UMA telecon 2021-05-13, UMA telecon 2021-05-20, UMA telecon 2021-05-27
Deferred
Charter Review/Refresh
Please review the Draft Charter 2021, changes have been highlighted in red.
(5)
A horizontal UMA security profile, considering other profiles including HEART, FAPI, and OAuth 2.1
Changes to Group Leadership
we need to renew our annual voting roles, Chair and Vice-Chair
Next quorum we'll need to discuss and ideally vote on this topic
Feel free to send nominations to the list so we're prepared at our next quorum. Alec will send a separate note to the list to raise this request
If you have a voting membership, please let Alec know if you can/can't attend next week
Relationship Manager
The last session was recorded, check it out so these will make sense
Discussed the merits of having a credential (public key) registered at the RS for a Resource Owner, and the different use-cases it starts to enable, both for UMA and getting into VC/SSI.
RO can sign policy it writes to the AS. THe RS can have less trust in the AS since it's really trusting the RO
Today the RS trusts the AS as the RO. With the credential, the RS can trust any AS
Give the RO some more fiduciary capability aside from systme-sytem (RS-AS) trust. This is part of Decentralized ID value prop
RO can delegate directly to other RqPs
Can this help the RS, not have to trust the RO as much? ANCR established the RO establish terms with any other system
Binding is the most critical bit of the trust flow. CIBA also solves for this, in a way that a RqP
UMA helps Alice ensure, that Bob is who he says, such that her policy can be applied to his request for Access
CIBA helps Bob ensure Alice is who she is. Currently we don't strongly bind Alice to the AS
Can we bind Alice to the AS, in a way the requesting party can confirm who she is?
ANCR wants to capture all this trusted state so that all parties can have this transparency, including getting Witnesses just in time. (parallels to a KERI witnesses, there is cryptogrpahic binding + attestation over an identifier)
ie UMA pushed claims, where the AS can 'ask for more' from a trusted thirdy party (the Witness)
RS can issue to Alice, VCs. Either resource's as a VC, or actually data-containing VCs. Alice is then free to delegate and use from there. (The ssi credential exchange api)
RS <strong trust> RO <> AS
RS <> AS <> RqP <> RPT{Alice's proof} <> RS
Alec will update the last RM Draft to:
Add back the credential, drop Authorization Servers API from it.
We're shifting the trust from the Fedz Auth api to the RO through their credential.
AOB
will be looking to setup an ANCR presentation to the Group is around a month. Sal will let us know when he's ready
Attendees
As of October 26, 2020, quorum is 5 of 9. (Michael, Domenico, Peter, Sal, Thomas, Andi, Alec, Eve, Steve)
Voting:
Michael
Steve
Eve
Alec
Sal
Domenico
Non-voting participants:
Scott
Colin
Regrets: