IAWG Meeting Minutes 2013-06-06

IAWG Meeting Minutes 2013-06-06

Kantara Initiative Identity Assurance WG Teleconference

Approved by IAWG 27 June 2013

 

Date and Time

Agenda

  1. Administration:

    1. Roll Call

    2. Agenda Confirmation

    3. Upcoming events page: http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/x/pYDWAw

    4. Secretary role announcement

  2. Discussion

    1. Feedback to the Government of Canada on "Guidelines on Identity Assurance"

    2. RP Guidelines call for participation

    3. Alignment with SP 800-63

  3. AOB

  4. Adjourn

 Attendees

  • Matthew Thompson

  • Myisha Frazier-McElveen

  • Cathy Tilton

  • Richard Wilsher

  • Scott Shorter

  • Bill Braithwaite

  • Andrew Hughes

As of 22 May 2013, quorum is 4 of 7

Non-Voting

  • Rich Furr

  • Ken Dagg

  • Jeff Stollman

Staff

  • Joni Brennan

Notes & Minutes

Administration 
  • Secretary role: Andrew Hughes has volunteered for the role.

  • Upcoming events page: members can edit directly, or send to staff

    • Community calendar is for all events

    • the Upcoming events page is for where Kantara intends to do something

Discussion

Feedback to the Government of Canada on "Guidelines on Identity Assurance"
  • Call for verbal comments or discussion prior to written response

  • Due to day-job time commitments, little progress

  • Ken offered to extend the deadline for comments to June 13 2013

  • Question: how does the Canadian document relate to similar docs from US or UK? Answer: the material was reviewed during document development. NZ & UK gov has provided comments so far.

RP Guidelines
  • Myisha notified that a draft call for participation has been sent out to the list 

  • Please send feedback

Ad Hoc Team Updates

Alignment with SP 800-63
  • Richard Wilsher provided a join.me 

  • Work to date has been distributed to IAWG list

  • Has restructured 800-63-2 to make analysis easier

  • Kantara talks about Subscriber and Subjects - NIST does not differentiate: they only use Subscriber - check the glossary section

  • 5.3 6.3 7.3 8.3 9.3 have been mapped - has skipped overviews and tutorial sections

  • Has added sub-numbering to enable more specific discussion

  • 5.3 section: the way 800-63-2 treats different LOAs is a bit mixed. RGW has re-sorted them into sections by LOA

  • Has broken down distinct requirements even if they originally appeared in single statements

    • then mapped each to the existing KI IAF item

    • there is a Many:Many relationship

  • In the KI SAC - has inserted indexes back into the modified 800-63

    • Note that there are SAC criteria that do not have an equivalent 

  • Comment: for those extra items, they originally came from Good Practice - Kantara's aim is to determine if the organization is sound. NIST assumes that Government Agencies are sound and following GSA guidance

  • Comment: Some of the items that are not specifically 800-63 criteria might actually be Privacy criteria

    • To create a Privacy profile, just go through the SAC and annotate them

  • There are some puzzling items

    • e.g. 5.3.1.2.5 question about item c) - it reads as if the bullets apply to all LOAs - it is difficult to disentangle the statements - is this a change request to NIST? RGW needs feedback.

  • Red Text to indicate where there might be the opportunity to define a US Profile:

    • 800-63-2 becomes very specific - there may be other options that could meet the criteria. 

    • There might be options that work outside of the US. 

    • These might be criteria that could be less specific in the SAC and use the US profile to include the more prescriptive material

    • There are items that do not currently exist in the SAC - question is do they need to be added?

  • Requested comments by 20 June 2013

    • RGW will send out a formal request for comment with a formal comments form

  • Intent with this work is

    • Result will be a Kantara owned publication

    • The mapping document will remain publicly viewable

    • Will be provided to NIST as suggestions for updates

  • The Comments back to RGW should eventually be posted to the wiki to enable future understanding of rationale

  • Comment: once the work is done, should schedule a IAWG F2F in DC area to discuss the approach and documents to update NIST and seek feedback

AOB
  • No items

Action Items

Item #

Description

Assigned to

Est. Completion

2013-06-06-001

Review and provide feedback on Govt. Canada guideline. IAWG will collect and send a consolidated version.

All

13 June 2013

2013-06-06-002

Review RGW 800-63-2 vs KI IAF mapping documents and provide feedback

All

20 June 2013

2013-06-06-003

Review and provide feed back to Myisha on Relying Party Guidelines call for participation

All

13 June 2013

2013-06-06-004

Send in event information to Staff for updating the community calendar and Upcoming Events

All

Info only

2013-06-06-005

IAWG-NIST F2F in DC area to discuss approach and feedback on 800-63 v IAF analysis approach

Staff / IAWG Leads

TBD

 

 

 

 

 

Attachments

Next Meeting