2018-07-12 Meeting notes (CR)

Date

2018-07-12

Status of Minutes

Approved

Approved at: 2019-12-12 Meeting notes (CR) DRAFT

Attendees

Voting

• Andrew Hughes

• Jim Pasquale

• Richard Gomer

• Oscar Santolalla

• Mark Lizar

Non-Voting

• Tom Jones

• Colin Wallis

• Sylvester Mbagwu

• Sal D'Agostino

Regrets

• John Wunderlich

• Kartik Venkatesh

Quorum Status

Meeting was quorate

Voting participants

Participant Roster (2016) - Quorum is 5 of 9 as of 2018-07-12

Iain Henderson, Mary Hodder, Harri Honko, Mark Lizar, Jim Pasquale, John Wunderlich, Andrew Hughes, Oscar Santolalla, Richard Gomer

Discussion Items

From 2018-07-12 call:

Andrew walked through the sequence diagram.

• Richard - the 'Export' consent receipt might be too disruptive to the user - maybe

• John Krogulski - what data formats? A: It's set out in the specification

• Mark - should we be using JWT for transfers?

  • A: This might be a complexity that we should incorporate in later interops

  • A: This is a complexity versus future-proofing question... ANDREW to ask the list/implementers

• ACTION: All to post comments to the wiki page about the sequence diagram, questions, clarifications etc.

• Storyboard

  • Ready to draft a user story - aiming for delivery on next call

• Tom - there are prior activities that are not showing on the sequence - the Data Subject has to be identified to the Controller and Platform including any consents

• Mark - the "initial consent flow" - the sequence is not showing the bootstrapping sequence - the sequence is showing the ongoing interactions

  • ACTION: Andrew to annotate with prerequistes and assumptions of user already being set up

• Richard

  • ACTION: to document the technical flows of Consentua in the context of the interop demo sequence

• Sylvester's Action item:

 ACTION: All to comment on these starter definitions, on list (note that the text above has already been edited)

From 2018-06-28

• Discussed Kartik's v1 of the sequence diagram

• Park: the discussion about 'viewer/reader/dashboard' and the differences in functionality that those terms encompass

• Has anyone played with the 'sand' demo app? URLs to follow by email

• First part of the demo:

  • Data Subject interacts with Organization A and as a result, a consent receipt is created and shown to the Data Subject. The consent receipt is stored in a place that is known to the Data Subject.

• Second part of the demo:

  • Data Subject starts their preferred app which they normally use to view and manage their consent receipts and sees a list of consent receipts that are in the place referenced from the first part of the demo. Data Subject clicks the new consent receipt and the contents are displayed.

• ACTION: Mark/Sylvester to write functional descriptions of the 'viewer/reader/dashboard' concepts

From 2018-06-21 call:

• John walked through the draft scenario

• Mircea: why would the receiving org need to generate a new CR?

  • A: Depends on the interpretation of Article 20 implementation

• Jim: digi.me's consent feature requires that the data processor notifies the user on downstream sharing

• Karik: Trunomi allows counterparties to be defined and data sharing rules defined up front. PSD2 scenarios - has 2 consents that are tracked - 3rd party doing payments on behalf and the financial institution

• ACH: Would it make sense to just do the simplest thing: one data controller mints a CR and a different org displays it.

• Richard: important to do display and that the back end system is following the CR instructions

• Jim: digi.me has started work to 'export' a CR artifact. The user might be notified of sharing event.

• John: starting to think that we should disconnect the demo scenario from any specific regulatory requirement - this should stay a technical demo

• Robert: agrees - show what you received is what was sent - and show multiple receipts that display in the same way

• ACH: related that people in unconference sessions are capable of imagining potential uses of CRs - we need to show the simplest functions

• Kartik: conceptually makes sense - questions on the details about how multiple platforms will play

• Mircea - need to decide on which systems take on what roles in the demo - which ones create CR, which ones consume & display

• Richard: in principle it is OK - what does it actually look like to a User - the UX and concept of a CR moving from one place to another - there is no metaphor for this yet

• Oscar: does not have viewer yet - so this would help to have some else's viewer to use

• Mark: is the CR moved directly by the back end or are the actions done by the User.

• ACH: has lined up a mobile operator as a issuer of CRs - but they have no viewer - they need the user to use someone else's viewer

• ACH: need to do a storyboard

• Robert: the metaphor should probably be the same as physical receipt management - one place to view them

• ACTION: Richard to sketch a story board for this

• ACTION: Kartik to ask questions around how consent management platforms - send to email - includes sequence diagram

• Mircea - is each consent receipt unique? and should it stay at the originator org? then the only thing transfered would be the CR id?

• ACTION: Jim - to list some of the high level activities that digi.me is undertaking

• Mark: OpenConsent is planning to have a Viewer by August

• Possible distinction: A Viewer - look at CRs one at a time. Dashboard - look at multiple CRs and act on them.

From 2018-06-14 call:

• Jim: any project wanting to participate in the MyData consent receipt interop demo - we need you do do a mapping against the CR fields - there is a spreadsheet!

• Need to ensure that the Use Case spotlights the user-centric approach. A motivator to show vendor-vendor interop is to demonstrate industry resilience.

• Since the CR will contain personal data (and probably sensitive data) we must avoid giving the impression that we are unware of risks and anti-patterns.

• There are 10 weeks remaining until presentation day!

• Next week's call:

  • Confirm the high-level scenario for the demo

    • Should this be limited to exchange of CRs? or showing data transfer that involves CRs

  • Discuss and finalize a sequence/interaction diagram

    • Confirm the CR-related roles required for the demo (Display-ers/dashboards, the Person, CR Issuers)

  • Richard Gomer is committed to the project (per Chris ) - will have input into the UX issues

    • The Consentua WebSDK demonstrator has embodied some of these concepts

  • Pre-work assignments (due for distribution to the WG by Tuesday):

    • John - will develop a draft sequence diagram