Date
2017-02-02
Status of Minutes
Approved
Approved at: 2019-12-12 Meeting notes (CR) DRAFT
Attendees
Voting
Non-Voting
Discussion Items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|
10 mins | - Roll call
- Agenda bashing
- Meeting minutes approval
| |
- "Move to approve listed meeting notes previously circulated"
- Motion:
- Second:
- Discussion:
- Result:
|
1 min | | All | Please review these blogs offline for current status on Kantara and all the DG/WG: |
5 min | | | - Public review and IPR claims period has started 2017-01-06, ends 2017-02-20
- 1 set of comments received to date
- The plan for comment disposition is that David as editor will review all incoming comments and prepare a disposition
- Once the comment period is closed, David will bring the proposed disposition as a whole to the WG for review and decision
|
| Plan for CR updates backlog | All | - Collect the list of items on the wiki
- When ready for processing, transfer into github
- ACTION: Mark to create an issues list page
- The Parking Lot page is a stale list of the issues list
|
|
|
|
|
30 min | Discussion on what's next on the roadmap | All |
New discussion 2016-01-12: - Note that Virtual has collected ideas from CIS individuals on how to market CR
- Note EU Article 29 data portability - from Iain email
- from the GDPR -The GDPR is a consent based legal framework which specifies "a structured, commonly used, machine-readable and interoperable format” pg 15(68) GDPR
- Discussion about organization structures that would support the work and participation best
- Note that there is a good case to re-launch the Public Policy & Privacy & Legal WG - the pace of regulation changes is high right now
- Governance is missing from the mind map
- Make sure this is in the charter of the top WG
- The terms of reference must make roles and responsibilities clear for e.g. Project Managers
- Make the case that projects can attract a different type of participant - the builders rather than the talkers
- By creating project teams we can assemble the required expertise regardless of which WG they come from
- Data Portability -> rename the Portable Data Exchange branch
- discussion
- PPP WG would have Data Portability in its remit
- The Data Exchange for portability (protocols/specifications) would be in this sub-group
- Portable data exchange - is mostly between data controllers rather than from the individual
Discussion from 2016-01-05:
- Digi.me has made adjustments to their approach - consent based versus permission led access model (to be discussed on a future call)
- The group discussed the draft mindmap of potential future org structures for this WG and also reviewed the current work list for 2017
- The WG leadership team will review and refine before sharing with the broader list
- (From December 1,2016meeting)
- The list of subject areas that will be worked on:
- Consent Receipt
- There will be CR spec errata that will need to be fixed
- A v1.1 will be required within 6 months after feedback from implementers
- User Submitted Terms
- Use case library and elaboration of use cases
- UX design
- Model contract language to support each feature of the UST elements
- Requirements for API / Interfaces for CR and UST artifacts
- Requirements (text) for implementers of Consent receipt generators (code)
- Requirements (text) for Consent receipt 'viewer' (code)
- Information Sharing Agreements
- Architecture and model (text and diagrams)
- Requirements (text)
- Business requirements
- Functional requirements
- Non-functional requirements
- Specifications (text)
- Build a Kantara prototype implementation of a consent receipt management system
|
5 min | Discussion about changing the CIS WGstructure after CR v1.0 | |
|
| Accounting for the WG Assets |
|
|
| Plan for CR updates backlog |
|
|
| New project ideas |
|
|