IAWG Meeting Minutes 2014-07-24

IAWG Meeting Minutes 2014-07-24

Kantara Initiative Identity Assurance WG Teleconference

 

Minutes approved on 2014-09-04 call

Date and Time

Agenda

NOTE: Carried over from 2014-07-14 which was not quorate

  1. Administration:

    1. Roll Call

    2. Agenda Confirmation

    3. Minutes approval: IAWG Meeting Minutes 2014-07-10

    4. Staff reports and updates

  2. Discussion

    1. FICAM TFS TFPAP v2 TFP Statement of Adoption update

    2. DRAFT IAF-3250 (S3A) status update

    3. US FICAM Profile - Shorter

    4. Profiling Rules - finalization request from ARB

  3. AOB

    1.  

  4. Adjourn

 Attendees

Link to IAWG Roster

As of 2014 May 6, quorum is 7 of 11

 

Meeting was quorate

 

Voting

  • Rich Furr ( C)

  • Andrew Hughes (S)

  • Scott Shorter

  • Richard Wilsher

  • Devin Kusek

  • Bill Braithwaite

  • Matt Thompson

  • Cathy Tilton

Non-Voting

  • Ken Dagg

  •  Colin Wallis

Staff

  •  Marjissa Jadrosich

  • Joni Brennan

Regrets

Notes & Minutes

Administration 

Minutes Approval

IAWG Meeting Minutes 2014-07-10

Motion to approve minutes of 2014-07-10: Thompson
Seconded: Kusek
Discussion: None
Motion Carried 

Staff Updates

  • 2 Fall events upcoming - check the main events page

Discussion

  • FICAM TFPAP v2 

    • Use the tables in the IAF 1400 to seed the mapping

    • IAF 5463 - useful mappings sources

    • Need to think more about the mapping of component terms - the new AP might be a function of a Kantara Authentication response.

  • IAF 3250 (S3A)

  • US FICAM Profile / restructuring

    • 2 proofs of concept have been circulated by Shorter 

    • Goal is to be able to express more than one profile 

      • To reorganize the IAF such that a FICAM profile is created based on a core set

    • v0.3 might be a mapping of the existing SAC v4 to this new format

    • This will be a substantial effort

    • Please comment back to Scott

    • Wilsher: this work is not the same as the TFPAP v2 conformance letter - this is a major change that would need to go through the 45 day public review process

      • Need to consider impact on approved entities and overall costs to do the work, and review cycles

    • The work is necessary for use in other jurisdictions

    • Q: Can the current v4 be profiled for use in Government of Canada?

      • A: From memory, there were some criteria that were in excess of what GC considered necessary.

      • A: Since the Profile technique only requires a tightening from the base, this causes incompatibility

    • Q: To what extent will the restructuring help GC to use the SAC?

      • A: Would need further study to determine, but sounds promising

    • There is much variation between schemes around things like proof of identification - this must be rationalized and managed

    • Dagg: perhaps this could considered as parameterization to meet the local requirements?

  • Profiling rules

    • Please read and review so that we can finalize approval of the document

    • The current draft is solid and stable, including the requirement to profile for increasing strength/rigour.

    • Next version of the Profiling rules could consider new approaches (some of which were discussed today)

    • Q: How does comparability line up with this? 

      • A: Comparable controls are at the implementation side of the Profile. The Profile is fixed - how it is implemented by a CSP could include comparable controls.

    • Note that the methods used by Government of Canada would not meet the requirements as stated in the SAC - simply because they have chosen different techniques

      • Note also that GC has contracts with 

    • Motion: To approve current draft of IAF 3410 (Profiling Rules) document to be v1.0 and to begin a review to ascertain approaches to satisfy multiple jurisdictional profiles to meet global requirements. :Wilsher; Second: Hughes; Opposed: None; Motion carries.

 

AOB

 

 

Next Meeting