2020-12-03 Minutes
Attendees:
Voting Participants: Mark Hapner, Mark King, Richard Wilsher, Den Dagg, Martin Smith
Non participants: Tom Smedighoff.
Staff: Colin Wallis, Ruth Puente
Quorum: 3 out of 5. There was quorum.
Agenda
Administration:
a.Roll Call
b.Agenda Confirmation
c. Action Item Review: action item list
d. Minutes approval 2020-11-12 DRAFT Minutes
e. Staff reports and updates - November Director's Corner
f. LC reports and updates
g. Call for Tweet-worthy items to feed (@KantaraNews)
2. Discussion
a. IAWG Leadership Election.
b. Consultation about proposed Australian Digital Identity legislation, see https://haveyoursay.digitalidentity.gov.au/
c. Annual Charter Review - https://kantara.atlassian.net/wiki/display/IAWG/IAWG+Charter
d. Criteria Guidance (Any participant suggestions for adding or enhancing guidance for understanding assessment criteria).
3. Any Other Business
Minutes Approval
2020-11-12 Minutes were approved by motion. Moved: Mark Hapner Seconded: Mark King. Unanimous Approval.
Updates
ED walked the group through his November Bog/Corner, which reflects the Members Annual General Meeting that took place on November 30th: 2020: November
PImDL DG is progressing well.
Kantara Exemplary Contribution Award - Richard Wilsher received the Award for the IAWG, see https://kantarainitiative.org/kantara-exemplary-contribution-award/
UMA WG - It's developing an equivalent of the FAPI profile of OIDC for Open Banking in the UK, in the form of a report; in about 3 months it would become a spec.
IAWG Leadership Election
Ken Dagg (for the Chair position) wand Martin Smith (for the Vice-Chair position) were nominated by acclamation.
Consultation about proposed Australian Digital Identity legislation
Ken commented that he has participated in an introduction call regarding the Australian government Consultation https://haveyoursay.digitalidentity.gov.au/. It was clarified that the framework is not under review, but they want some legal aspects related to the framework to become law. They are proposing a legislation in relation to liability, litigation, penalties, obligations on RPs, IdPs and other parties involved in their identity ecosystem.
Ken will develop a draft and send it as GDoc to the participants of this call.
The plan is to review and agree on the comments during the next meeting that will take place on December 10th. The deadline to submit comments is December 18th.
CO_SAC criteria
Richard presented a proposal to the IAWG regarding a sub-set of CO_SAC, which will be an errata document. He suggested some changes to optimize the criteria.
In the CO_SAC, there are criteria about the Enterprise and Service Maturity; Notices and Subscriber Information/Agreements that address the things that a service should do for subscribers and subjects. But for the component service case, he said that we should have a parallel requirement which states what the component service should do for its user/client.
It should be considered to reword the criteria from the perspective of the service consumer. For instance, having in mind the consumer of a component service e.g. a full service.
The group agreed to complete this revision by early January 2021.
AoB
Ruth commented about the NIST Webinar on FIPS 201-3 next week: https://www.nist.gov/news-events/events/2020/12/draft-fips-201-3-virtual-public-workshop
Ken asked the group to review the IAWG Charter to confirm if a revision is needed.