2022-08-03 Meeting notes
APPROVED
Date
Attendees
See the Participant roster
Voting (5 of 9 required for quorum)
# | Participant | Attending |
---|---|---|
1 | Davis, Peter | Yes |
2 | D'Agostino, Salvatore | |
3 | Hodges, Gail | |
4 | Hughes, Andrew | |
5 | Jones, Thomas | Yes |
6 | Krishnaraj, Venkat | |
7 | Thoma, Andreas | Yes |
8 | Williams, Christopher | |
9 | Wunderlich, John | Yes |
Non-Voting
# | Participant | Attending |
---|---|---|
1 | Aronson, Marc | |
2 | Balfanz, Dirk | |
3 | Chaudhury, Atef | |
4 | Brudnicki, David | |
5 | Dutta, Tim | |
6 | Fleenor, Judith | |
7 | Glasscock, Amy | |
8 | Gropper, Adrian | |
9 | Jordaan, Loffie | Yes |
10 | LeVasseur, Lisa | |
11 | Lopez, Cristina Timon | |
12 | Snell, Oliver | |
13 | Stowell, Therese | |
14 | Tamanini, Greg | |
15 | Vachino, Maria | |
16 | Whysel, Noreen |
Other attendees
Goals
- Check-in on work progress
- Review draft outline and status of writing tasks
Discussion items (AKA Agenda)
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Start the meeting. Call to order, check a | |||
10 min. | Open Tasks Review | All | Task reportLooking good, no incomplete tasks. |
5 min. | Draft Report Discussion |
Tasks:
| |
20 min. | Requirements Review | John Wunderlich is asking the group if anyone would like to step forward on an interim basis because both Andrew Hughes (the workgroup secretary) and Christopher Williams (the workgroup co-chair) are unable to attend the weekly meetings due to work constraints. We had a process discussion to ensure that the workgroup keeps moving forward. There was consensus that the wide-ranging (and sometimes 'rat-holed' discussion on 04_V_AC Contextually appropriate Verifier Identification was useful, but we don't want to do that for every requirement. The following resulted:
With input from the members, we will try and put two requirements on the agenda for each meeting so the workgroup members can make their comments and prepare for the requirements to be addressed at each meeting. | |
Other Business | There was a brief discussion following up on last week's discussion about how much a verifier should say about themselves, which Tom Jones pointed out is as much an anti-spoofing issue as anything else. John Wunderlich pointed out that what is appropriate might be dependent on the 'disclosure context', and PeterD (Deactivated) pointed out that it may be dependent on 'purpose specification'. It was suggested that disclosure choice is based on what the "Holder" as individual chooses, whereas purpose specification cames from the "Verifier" and may be validated or interpreted by the "Holder Agent" before being presented to the "Holder". | ||
5 min. | Adjourn | 13:40 |
Next meeting
Action items
- John Wunderlich to work on Privacy Principles v Requirements gap analysis