2020-11-05 Meeting Minutes ISI WG

Kantara ISI WG Teleconference

Date and Time | Attendees | Apologies | Agenda | Minutes | Next Meeting

Date and Time

  • Date:
  • Time: 10:30 Eastern Time

Approval: 2020-11-19 Meeting Minutes ISI WG

Attendees

Participant Roster - As of 2020-02-20, the quorum is 6 of 11

(Voting participants are: Andrew Hughes  iainh1 NA (Unlicensed), jim pasquale, John WunderlichKen Klingenstein (Unlicensed), Former user (Deleted)Mark Lizar (Unlicensed), Former user (Deleted)Former user (Deleted), Salvatore D'Agostino, Former user (Deleted) )

Voting

  1. Andrew Hughes  
  2. jim pasquale  
  3. iainh1 NA (Unlicensed)
  4. John Wunderlich
  5. Former user (Deleted)
  6. Ken Klingenstein (Unlicensed)
  7. Former user (Deleted)

Non-Voting 

  1. Colin Wallis (Unlicensed)
  2. Former user (Deleted)


Apologies

  1. Salvatore D'Agostino
  2. Mark Lizar (Unlicensed)

Agenda

  1. Call to order
  2. ISI Work Group IPR Policy
  3. Approval of Agenda
  4. Approval of Minutes 2020-10-29; 2020-10-15;
    1. Action Items arising from minutes
  5. Work Group Discussion & Decision Items
    1. Discussion on PDURF - content focused continued
    2. 1. Comments that need to be incorporated for inclusion in Andrew's suggested route;
      2. Comments that belong to the more substantial discussion of the alternate route.
  1. Announcements: 

    Overview of the Foster Bill with Jeremy Grant, Better Identity Coalition speaking to the Kantara folks who are interested.
    Wednesday, Nov 11, 2020 1:00 PM - 2:00 PM (EST)

  2. New Business

  3. Next Meeting:  
  4. Adjournment

Minutes

Item

Who

Notes

Call to Order

Check for a quorum. Quorum achieved.

Reminder about attendance policy for voting status.

ISI Work Group IPR Policy

A reminder of IPR policy for the WG
Approval of Agenda

Moved: John Wunderlich

Seconded: jim pasquale

Approved

Approval of Minutes


Discussion: None

Changes: 10/29 to be amended to reflect Mary's comments

Carried

Actions arising: 10/29 meeting notes to be amended

Project Updates (Month-end Updates) (not required this meeting)

  • AdvCIS
  1. Deliverables
    1. ?
  2. Status: INACTIVE
  3. Issues:
    1. ?
  4. Next Steps:
    1. ?
  • Intentcasting
  1. Deliverables
    1. Report on Intentcasting
  2. Status: INACTIVE
  3. Issues:
    1. Resourcing
  4. Next Steps:
    1. Resume in October
  • Personal Data Use Receipt Framework
  1. Deliverables
    1. PDUR Framework
  2. Status: ACTIVE
  3. Issues:
    1. Draft report comments and review
  4. Next Steps:
    1. Merge comments into single document
    2. Mary to lead discussion on 11/12
    3. Lisa to lead discussion on 11/19
  • Privacy-Preserving Information Sharing
  1. Deliverables
    1. Survey Report
    2. Recommendation Report
  2. Status: INACTIVE
  3. Issues:
    1. Insufficient availability to proceed at this point
  4. Next Steps:
    1. Find a new lead to move the project forward OR
    2. Resume when available

WG Discussion

  • Personal Data Use Receipt Framework

jim pasquale Provided an overview

Former user (Deleted) Continued the walk-through of the PDURF


Group discussion on a number of issues (if you are reading this, please email Former user (Deleted) or make changes to reflect your actual comments:

  • Discussion around review of comments in V2 of the PDURF and the merge of two external versions (sent over email in the summer & also noted in the comments).
  • Former user (Deleted) discussion on next steps around reviewing the revised Data Model.
  • Former user (Deleted) discussion on one-page proposed text for PDURF
  • Discussion around best manner to address comments - proposed to focus on the substantive discussion items with Former user (Deleted) and Former user (Deleted) leading the discussion of their respective comments.
  • Former user (Deleted) discussion on refreshing consent and 2FA authentication communication - UC4. This eliminates potential dark patterns whereby conflagration between these two items might be possible.
  • Former user (Deleted) discussion on the Data Operation Party - addition of Receipt Authority to the existing Receipt Issuer & Receipt Recipient. Is the Receipt Authority a separate category (legal entity / framework / policy endpoint), and therefore not a Data Operator? 
  • Input / Output recipients of data are NOT Data Operators
  • However, the Receipt Authority can be a Data Operator
  • Reference material - the MyData operator components are similar:

    http://mydata2016.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/mydata-operator.png

Announcements All

Overview of the Foster Bill with Jeremy Grant, Better Identity Coalition speaking to the Kantara folks who are interested:


Wednesday, Nov 11, 2020 1:00 PM - 2:00 PM (EST)
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/36402106

You can also dial in using your phone.
United States: +1 (571) 317-3129
Access Code: 364-021-061

New BusinessAll



Next meeting

All

*** Next call 2020-11-12 10:30 am Eastern DAYLIGHT Time

https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/323930725

AdjournmentMotion carried




Action Items

  • Type your task here, using "@" to assign to a user and "//" to select a due date
  • Former user (Deleted) will perform a merge between the DRAFT PDUR Framework versions (John+Mary's comments merged with John+Lisa's comments)