2020-12-03 Meeting Minutes ISI WG

Owned by Former user (Deleted)
Last updated: Feb 05, 2021 by jim pasquale

Kantara ISI WG Teleconference

Date and Time | Attendees | Apologies | Agenda | Minutes | Next Meeting

Date and Time

  • Date:
  • Time: 10:30 Eastern Time

Approval: 2021-02-04 Meeting Minutes ISI WG Meeting (DRAFT)

Attendees

Participant Roster - As of 2020-02-20, the quorum is 6 of 11

(Voting participants are: Andrew Hughes  iainh1 NA (Unlicensed), jim pasquale, John Wunderlich,  Ken Klingenstein (Unlicensed), Former user (Deleted), Mark Lizar (Unlicensed), Former user (Deleted), Former user (Deleted), Salvatore D'Agostino, Former user (Deleted) )

Voting  

  1. Jim Pasquale  
  2. John Wunderlich
  3. Iain Henderson

  4. Mary Hodder

  5. Kenneth Klingenstein

Non-Voting 

  1. Kate Downing 
  2. Colin Wallis

Apologies

  1. Andrew Hughes
  2. Oscar Santolalla (sabbatical)

Agenda

  1. Call to order
  2. ISI Work Group IPR Policy
  3. Approval of Agenda

  4. Approval of Minutes if a quorum

Agenda

  1. Director's Corner
  2. PDUR Framework

Minutes

Item

Who

Notes

Call to Order

jim pasquale

Check for a quorum. Quorum achieved.

Reminder about attendance policy for voting status.

ISI Work Group IPR Policy

jim pasquale

A reminder of IPR policy for the WG
Approval of Agenda

Moved: 

Seconded: 


Approval of Minutes


Moved: 

Seconded:

Discussion: None

Changes: None

Actions arising: None

Project Updates (Month-end Updates) (not required this meeting)

  • AdvCIS

Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) 

  1. Deliverables
    1. ?
  2. Status: INACTIVE
  3. Issues:
    1. ?
  4. Next Steps:
  • Intentcasting

iainh1 NA (Unlicensed)

  1. Deliverables
    1. Report on Intentcasting
  2. Status: INACTIVE
  3. Issues:
    1. Resourcing
  4. Next Steps:
    1. Resume in 2021
  • Personal Data Use Receipt Framework

Former user (Deleted)


  1. Deliverables
    1. PDUR Framework
  2. Status: ACTIVE
  3. Issues:
    1. Draft report comments and review located here - Personal Data Use Receipt Framework Contribution
  4. Next Steps:
    1. ?
  • Privacy-Preserving Information Sharing

John Wunderlich

  1. Deliverables
    1. Survey Report
    2. Recommendation Report
  2. Status: INACTIVE
  3. Issues:
    1. Insufficient availability to proceed at this point
  4. Next Steps:
    1. Find a new lead to move the project forward OR
    2. Resume when available

WG Discussion

Personal Data Use Receipt Framework

jim pasquale Provided an overview

Continued the walk-through of the PDURF


Group discussion on a number of issues (if you are reading this, please email Former user (Deleted) or make changes to reflect your actual comments located in the v0.2 Word document

  • Discussion around the review of comments in v0.2 of the PDURF
  • Notes from conversation held within the document comments
Announcements All

Director's corner updates regarding the AGM are available on the website. Congratulations to 2020 award-winning contributors. Thank you Oscar.

Voting for 2021 positions will take place next week, when ISI-WG has a quorum. Anyone who wishes to run for a chair or co-chair position may self-nominate by reaching out to Staff @Kantara.

New BusinessAll

Ken Klingenstein (Unlicensed) No new trust frameworks until a comparison of existing trust frameworks have been conducted. Privacy frameworks are likely embedded within these trust frameworks, and consent frameworks within these privacy frameworks. Consent mechanisms such as duration, collection, usage, disclosure etc. should be rationalized. Suggestion to create a comparison prior to moving forwards. High-level analysis prior to a deeper dive? Places where consent is defined TODAY (in legislation, regs, etc.)

Motion to consider this when we next achieve a quorum.

John Wunderlich Suggestion to rephrase consent as authority so that legal agreements and other appropriate basis for authorization are captured. Do 'you' have an authority to collect? Is this legitimate interest? If this is consent how is this determined? We are not looking to understand the legal basis, we are instead looking to scope this as an understanding of the MECHANISM for consent (purpose of use).

IAB framework is upstream of the PDURF - we instead might want to understand if this is an allowable use based upon the mechanism itself?

(perhaps this is a deeper-dive?) is the usage consistent w/ purpose of use?

(e.g. publish individual's data on company newsletter – I have the data; is this purpose allowed under the basis that I hold this data?)

Former user (Deleted) View https://www.thetradedesk.com to see concerns with 'absolutely verifiable' identity all the time... (privacy minimization); pseudonyms are part of our reality & the need for companies / individuals to categorically & definitively identify an individual at every juncture is disturbing

Next meeting

All

*** Next call 2020-12-10 10:30 am Eastern DAYLIGHT Time

https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/323930725

Adjournment

Moved: Ken Klingenstein (Unlicensed)

Seconded: John Wunderlich

Motion carried



Action Items

  • Type your task here, using "@" to assign to a user and "//" to select a due date
  • Ken Klingenstein (Unlicensed) to share a checklist of touch-points for the next meeting