Date
Oct 13, 2016
Attendees
Voting
Non-Voting
Regrets
- John Wunderlich
- Iain Henderson
Goals
Discussion Items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|
10 mins | - Roll call
- Agenda bashing
- Minutes approval
| Former user (Deleted) | |
25 min | | Former user (Deleted) | - David to reply to Iain's comment on list
- This CR document will not be sufficient for what Iain is describing - other documents and work will fill that need, but this specific document is not all-encompasing
- Other comments: it would be helpful to describe the broader context within the Introduction section
- Is there a document family that CIS WG will develop over time?
- Can we create a list of 'documents that must be written' - to allow us to refer to documents that don't exist yet but will fill in the obvious missing bits
- An 'Executive Summary' section would be helpful
- In the UMA document model, they use the Use Cases to contain what is effectively the Executive Summary
- Look at OAuth/OpenID Connect document family to see if there's a good list of docs
- Maybe WS* family
- Maybe ISO 15504 (capability maturity model)
- Maybe W3C?
- The 'Purpose List' text should probably be removed from the specification - it's specific to the verticals/implementers and very hard for this group to resolve
- Display of PII/sensitive information - there are a few issues still to be resolved - such as if a CR is transmitted and has PII in it, then there are privacy concerns and security concerns
- Discussion on aspects of presentation of CR information to humans
|
| - Funding requests to LC/Board
| Mark Lizar | - This is the time of year to submit funding requests to LC and Board
|
15 min | - Discussion on IIW plans and activities
| All | - Andrew, David, Colin, Mary, John W, Jim P attending IIW
- Mary and Doc presenting UST to VRM Day
- Mary and John presenting CR to VRM Day
|
20 min | - Discussion on future structure of the WG
| Former user (Deleted) | - Thoughts on WG structure once CR v1 is into approval process
- There are several projects and interests that contribute to the larger topic of Consent and Information Sharing
- But these projects don't require every single participant to work on every project
- Digi.me is seeking to startup a taxonomy group in Kantara for the Personal Data community
|
Action Items
CR Spec publication schedule
Current: call for comments on draft spec commences
| | |
---|
September 19 | Close of business (Pacific) deadline for feedback on spec draft including examples and feedback from implementers. | |
September 22 | WG call to review CR draft structure | |
September 29 | WG call to review CR draft and discuss items needing resolution | |
October 6 | WG call | |
October 13 | WG call | |
October 20 | Candidate draft to WG. Decision required if the draft is sufficiently mature to base an IIW session on it. | |
October 27 | Final working session for WG (with/without IIW comments) on candidate draft | |
November 3 | Final draft for WG review | |
November 10 | Working group ballot - must be approved by WG on Nov 10th | |
November 15 | Send doc to the Leadership Council. They must approve it by Nov 30. | |
November 30 | LC Approval decision | |
December 1 | Kantara all member ballot begins. | |
January 15 2017 | Earliest Spec approval date | |