2016-06-02 Meeting Minutes (Quorate)
Date
Jun 02, 2016
Attendees
Harri Honoko
@John Wunderlich
@Former user (Deleted)
@Eve Maler
John Murphy
@Mark Lizar (Unlicensed)
@Former user (Deleted)
Discussion
Discuss Iain's email on the list.
There should not be a machine readable consent receipt to begin with, but machine readable should come in at a second stage
John said the original idea was just the data dictionary
Eve suggested option C from her email thread: we just call the notice a conformance level and a JSON conformance level
Harri - Say that we need to do the whole thing with JSON or it generates fragmentation - without machine readable it does not generate digital infrastructure..
IDEA: put it all in the spec as "modes"
Colin Wallis - David Turner is waiting in the wings suggesting that we split the technical and the field discussions into two tracks
Mary is Asking for a motion on way to move forward
We had a motion to pass this statement about development of the Consent Receipt spec: The spec should reflect conformance modes, including a level of technical conformance with JSON mark-up for interoperability, and also a data dictionary-only mode for conformance would include the wording or clauses alone.
Eve made the motions
John made amendments
Mark Seconded.
there were no objections
Discuss Meeting On Thursday instead of Monday
Thursday call is agreed 7 am PT - 10 EST - 3pm GMT - 5pm EET
Discuss technical spec writer for the specification - Colin's email regarding spec writer will require a bit more money from the board and he will work toward this.
Mark to take examples of v0.7.9 and put into v0.7.8 - spec, as well as start to turn into google doc then share with WG for review.
Action Items