IAWG Meeting Minutes 2012-02-22

Owned by Former user (Deleted)
Last updated: Mar 05, 2012
2 min read

Attendees:
Myisha Frazier-McElveen
Nathan Faut
Rainer Hoerbe
Linda Goettler
Colin Soutar
Joe Stuntz
Patrick Curry
Neil Clowes
John Bradley
Richard Wilsher
Richard Trevorah

Apologies:
Rich Furr
Bill Braithwaite

Staff:
Joni Brennan
Anna Ticktin

Minutes:

1. ADMINISTRATIVE:

  • Roll Call
  • Motion for minutes approval: 15 Feb 2012
  • Richard Trevorah moves to approve the minutes as recorded.  Patrick Curry and John Bradley second. With no further discussion or objection, the motion carries.

2. F2F MEETING - proposed topics for discussion:

  • PAC
  • RAF
  • Marketing Collateral
  • It is unclear at this time whether the IAWG will require a telecon line to host its own session or simply join a P3 joint-session.

Proposed roadmap action :

  • Aligning with the latest revision of 800-63

3. IAF V 2.0 REVIEW
Point in Time vs. Period of Time

  • The wg discussed Ken Dagg's comments to the proposed text:
  • Table in section 1.1.  I don't know if the values are set in stone or not.  If not, I would suggest, given the importance of an LOA4 service (i.e., the impact if it is wrong) to a RP, that the Minimal Operational Period for a LOA4 be a minimum of 180 days (and I would be happier with a full year).  Less than this period does not, to me, provide the perception of stable operations that I would expect from someone that is giving me a LOA4 assertion.
  • RGW will research the location of the term "operational" and then redirect language to address that point.
  • Section 1.2. I would suggest that the time period for the follow-on report be reduced for LOA3 and LOA4 – perhaps on a graduated scale (120 for LOA3 and 90 for LOA4).  Similar to the point I made in 1) above I would also be happy if a LOA4 service could not participate in DZ.  That being said, I understand the business reality.  Perhaps, for a LOA4 we could require two follow-on reports at day 90 and day 180.
  • RGW is okay with adjusting text to address LOA 3 reducing that period to 60 days.
  • RGW is suggesting this language would sit in a new document within the set

4. AOB

  • Next week's call is cancelled due to presumed low attendance in light of the RSA conference.
  • Patrick volunteers that there are new issues arising around doing business in the cloud, and will provide a more detailed report in due course.

Adjourned