AIM WG Notes 10-July-2013
Call not at quorum
Date and Time
- Date: Wednesday, 10 July 2013
- Time: 07:00 PT | 10:00 ET | 14:00 UTC
- Dial-in: United States Toll +1 (805) 309-2350
- Alternate Toll +1 (714) 551-9842
- Skype: +99051000000481
- Conference code: 613-2898
Agenda
- Administration:
- Roll Call
- Agenda Confirmation
- Approval of Minutes:AIM WG Minutes 01-May-2013
- Discussion / Action Item Review
- the AIM WG charter and next steps
- the AIM WG charter and next steps
- AOB
- Adjourn
Attendees
- David Chadwick
As of May 1, 2013, quorum is 5 of 9
Non-Voting
- Ken Dagg
- Colin Wallis
Staff
- Joni Brennan
Apologies
Minutes
- Approval of Minutes:AIM WG Minutes 01-May-2013
2.Discussion / Action Item Review
- the AIM WG charter and next steps
- the AIM WG charter and next steps
Administration
Action Items
Action | Assigned To | Status | Description | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20121127-06 | Allan Foster | in progress, Ken Dagg input | Review AMDG Recommendations and verify if/how they tie in to the AIMWG work | |
| 20121211-01 | Group | Review Attribute Design draft | Determine on next call if this is something group wants to discuss further | |
| 20130109-02 | Keith Hazelton | create a semantic diagram that will look something at a historical perspective | Keith to post to wiki and lead a discussion on April 3 call | |
| 20130123-01 | Kirk Fergusson | Share the working definitions for components in their diagram | ||
| 20130515-01 | Keith Hazelton | Provide links to relevant notes taken in recent IIW 16 sessions | these links will be added to these notes and the AIM repository of information |
New Action Items
Action | Assigned To | Status | Description | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AIMWG CHARTER REVIEW SUGGESTIONS...as suggested by Joni
Recommendations taken from AMDG Report |
Discussion
Question is – is there alignment between the AIM WG Charter and the AM DG report and we know this is an action to review that Allan took.
Action: The AMDG report should at least have mention in the Charter and that it would consumed as input and incorporated as appropriate in to the identified WG deliverables.
Specifically, the Work Group will create a set of best practice documents around:
- The handling of attributes by Identity Providers, Relying Parties, and Service Providers
- The definition and proposed use for contexts
- The definition, best use, requirements and criteria of an Attribute Broker
Possible to make the charter more generic?
ADD TO CHARTER: There may be additional documents proposed for creation as further research becomes available it may be incorporated as appropriate in to a AIM WG work item.
ACTION: Pull out recommendations from AM DG report so that AIMWG people can more easily review them. DONE
Possible: add value statements with recommendations to help determine who might want to see the work done and provide resources.
UK Gov has listed the attributes that they’ll be looking – UK and US have identified some sets of attributes but it seems there’s no actual document to describe
Basic document that identifies what attributes are needed at what levels of assurance would be a useful item.
Basic document on how Attributes would be assured or Verified?
Role of public sector in helping established trusted attributes.
Authoritative vs Derived (derived is also called “registered” that were acquired from somewhere else).
Identified that there is not an accepted terminology around Attribute Management.
Authoritative can be become derived and derived can be come authoritative. == Attributes in Motion
X-509 has some starting definitions.
New Zealand is having some similar discussions right now. Colin will try to send some pointers to the group.
Next Call
- Date: Wednesday, 24 July 2013
- Time: 07:00 PT | 10:00 ET | 15:00 UTC
- Dial-in: United States Toll +1 (805) 309-2350
- Alternate Toll +1 (714) 551-9842
- Skype: +99051000000481
- Conference code: 613-2898