Weekly Meeting 2013 07 09 Notes
Information Sharing Work Group Teleconference
Date and Time
Tuesday, Jun 11 : 4:30pm PDT, 7:30pm EDT
Wednesday, Jun 12 : 12:30am UK, 9:30am JT, 11:30pm NZDT
Please join my meeting via GoToMeeting
Join the conference call
Skype: +99051000000481
US Dial-In: +1-805-309-2350
UK Dial-In: +44-20-3137-5285
Conference ID: 178-2540
GoToMeeting ID: 844-771-298
Attendees
Joe Andrieu
Lionel Klee
Apologies
Agenda
Attendance
Approval of Prior Minutes & Other Motions
Prior Action Item Review
Continuing Business
Survey
Rechartering to include efforts like Open Notice Open Notice/Consent Commons ( http://opennotice.org )
New Business
Action Item Review
Next meeting schedule
Minutes
1. Attendance
We noted that with 2 of 4 voting members in attendance, quorum was met.
2. Motions
None
3. Prior Action Item Review
Joe: Needs to talk to Joni DONE
Joe: Write a blurb re: funding for Survey – Enrolled Craig Honnick
Joe: Write a blurb re: secretary internship – No action
Mark: Set up a meeting with Joe & Iain DONE
4. Continuing Business
Survey
Current survey: the current questionaire is likely to illicit extremely biased results. I had a great talk with Craig Honnick and he walked through the possible challenges. It almost certainly would be problematic to treat it quantitatively, but if our focus is on qualitative, maybe we can still make use of it. In smaller numbers, but in richer format.
Joe: I'd like to do two things.
First, translate this into Google Consumer Surveys and see if we can afford to get a few dozen responses and see what we can get.
Second, see if we can't find some way to do some interviews. That means volunteer resources I'm not sure we have available.
At the same time, Craig and I are going to put together a proposal for doing a more thorough, rigorous study in the $5-10k range. Once we have that proposal, we can shop it around and see if we can't get someone to support it. Maybe we do it as as Kickstarter.
Open Notice/Consent Commons ( http://opennotice.org)
5. New Business
RealMe
RealMe is live as of July 1. No receiving parties yet, but the system is up and the Kiwi version of the label is in place. Two sources of "authoritative" data. Be interesting to see how the self-asserted data fills in.
Q: Is the data displayed in transit (like form fill) or is it transferred in the background (like Facebook)
A: The assertion service shows the data, the RP is asked to show it, but may or may not.
Assertion service retrieves the data from the data stores and shows it to the user
The RP retreives the data from the assertion services
Scenarios
For the second survey, we want to look at five canonical situations where the label might be seen by users. If we can do that well, we'll have a good foundation for thinking about the major users. These should also be good for our own discussion
Factor Changes:
Brand — Un/Known, Un/Favorable
Data – Contact info, name, SSN, DOB, DNA, Credit Card, Bank Info
Purpose – Payment, Delivery, FREE stuff, Website Access
Aligned & Misaligned Data & Purpose
Give data X to Y for Z
Purchase
Reservation
Reservations
Making a hotel reservation at Hotels.com, providing Credit Card details.
Making a bicycle rental reservation at Joe's SF Bike Tours, providing Credit Card details.
Content
Accessing web content at Bacardi.com, providing DOB.
Accessing web content at Nickelodeon, providing DOB.
Accessing web content at Google, providing DOB.
Photos
Upload a photo of yourself on Facebook to share with your friends
Upload a photo of your friends on Facebook to share with your friends
Upload a photo of your friends on Joe's SF Bike Tours, to help promote
Upload a photo a Bacardi.com, to enter a promotion
Upload a photo of X to Y for Z
Open a bank account
You're placed under arrest
Process: Let's look at the data and see that we have a good scenario where we would normally share it.
Hypothesis: alignment of data & purpose is a dominant factor
6. Action Items
7. Next Meeting
Tuesday July 2 : 12:30 pm PDT, 3:30pm EDT, 8:30pm UK,
Wednesday Juy 3 : 4:30am JT, 7:30am NZT
60 minutes